2002
DOI: 10.3758/bf03196255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic catastrophe analysis of switches in the perception of apparent motion

Abstract: An important objective when the dynamics of visual perception are studied is to discover the nonlinear basis for cooperative phenomena such as bistability and hysteresis, phenomenathat are not readily explainedby a linear model. Bistability means that more than one percept is possible for a single stimulus. Hysteresis means that what is perceived at any moment depends on the preceding state of the visual system. As a result, perception depends on the direction of parameter change. When a parameter is gradually… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will argue here that the presence of 1/ f a noise does not necessarily indicate the presence of nonlinearity or deterministic chaos: In fact, 1/ f a noise and nonlinearity are to a large extent orthogonal concepts. This is an important point, not only because the necessary relation between 1/ f a noise and nonlinearity sounds (falsely) plausible given the relationship elsewhere between chaotic functions and selfsimilarity (e.g., the Mandelbrot set; Mandelbrot, 1982), but also because the presence of nonlinear structure in the dynamics of human cognition has received some attention recently (see, e.g., Busemeyer, Weg, Barkan, Li, & Ma, 2000;Elman, 1998;Heath, 2000;Heath, Kelly, & Longstaff, 2000;Kelly, Heathcote, Heath, & Longstaff, 2001;Kelso et al, 1998;Ploeger, van der Maas, & Hartelman, 2002;Port & van Gelder, 1995;Pressing, 1999a;Roe, Busemeyer, & Townsend, 2001;Thelen & Smith, 1994;Usher & McClelland, 2001;Ward, 2002).…”
Section: /F ␣ Noise and Nonlinearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will argue here that the presence of 1/ f a noise does not necessarily indicate the presence of nonlinearity or deterministic chaos: In fact, 1/ f a noise and nonlinearity are to a large extent orthogonal concepts. This is an important point, not only because the necessary relation between 1/ f a noise and nonlinearity sounds (falsely) plausible given the relationship elsewhere between chaotic functions and selfsimilarity (e.g., the Mandelbrot set; Mandelbrot, 1982), but also because the presence of nonlinear structure in the dynamics of human cognition has received some attention recently (see, e.g., Busemeyer, Weg, Barkan, Li, & Ma, 2000;Elman, 1998;Heath, 2000;Heath, Kelly, & Longstaff, 2000;Kelly, Heathcote, Heath, & Longstaff, 2001;Kelso et al, 1998;Ploeger, van der Maas, & Hartelman, 2002;Port & van Gelder, 1995;Pressing, 1999a;Roe, Busemeyer, & Townsend, 2001;Thelen & Smith, 1994;Usher & McClelland, 2001;Ward, 2002).…”
Section: /F ␣ Noise and Nonlinearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where z indicates the behavior variable (dependent variable), β and α represent two control parameters (called the splitting and normal parameters, respectively), and C (α, β) is an integration constant (Ploeger et al, 2002 One of the more difficult aspects of stochastic catastrophe modeling is the identification of proper control parameters for the model. In previous studies (Hufford et al, 2003), we have experienced great success with proximal and distal risk as the normal and splitting control parameters, respectively.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamical modeling for the motion quartet has also been based on catastrophe analysis (Ploeger, van der Maas, & Hartelman, 2002). …”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%