Stochastic Dominance Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation in Subsistence Crop Production in the Eastern Ethiopian Highlands: The Case of the Hunde-Lafto Area

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze whether investment in soil and water conservation results in a higher yield and income and/or mitigate variability in yield and income to subsistence farm households in the Hunde-Lafto area. Net returns from crop production with and without soil and water conservation (SWC) are compared based on stochastic dominance (SD) criteria. A non-parametric first order SD and normalized second order are used for data analysis. Analysis is based on the Soil Conservation Research Program (SCRP) database for the Hunde-Lafto research unit. The results of the analysis suggest that adopting a conservation strategy results in higher grain yield and net return than in not adopting. The normalized second order SD analysis results do not support the hypothesis that conservation strategy is unambiguously better than a noconservation strategy in reducing variability in yield and net return to farmers. However, conservation strategy has shown second order dominance at lower levels of yield and income that often correspond to unfavorable rainfall conditions. This makes it a preferred strategy to cope with the most prevalent risk factor of moisture shortage. Therefore, appropriate policies to help and encourage farmers to adopt SWC structures will contribute to improving the welfare of subsistence farm households in the study area and in other similar settings in the country. Designing and implementing SWC techniques that may result in unambiguous second order SD dominance will further improve the desirability and adoption of conservation measures. Copyright Springer 2005erosion, Ethiopia, net return, soil and water conservation, stochastic dominance, Q24, renewable resources and conservation,

The Economics of Sustainable Land Management Practices in the Ethiopian Highlands

“…Most of these studies, however, have a bias towards soil conservation as a productivity-enhancing technology. In moisture-stressed area of eastern Ethiopia, Bekele's (2005) research showed that plots with soil bunds 5 produce higher yields than those without. Kassie and Holden (2006) used cross-sectional farm-level data to demonstrate that in high rainfall areas, such as those in northwestern Ethiopia, fanya-juu terracing has no productivity gains.…”

Climate Change Perception and Farmers’ Adoption of Sustainable Land Management for Robust Adaptation in Cameroon

“…For instance, studies have shown that farming decisions that include farm managers employing soil bunds and terracing to control runoff and soil erosion produce higher yields (Benin, 2006;Pender & Gebremedhin, 2006;Bekele, 2005). The economic returns on physical soil and water conservation investments, as well as their impacts on productivity have been shown to be positive and significant (Shively, 1998;Gebremedhin et al, 1999;Kassie et al, 2008).…”

Are soil conservation technologies “win-win?” A case study of Anjeni in the north-western Ethiopian highlands

“…Using stochastic dominance analysis (SDA) and non-experimental farmlevel data collected in the Philippines, Shively (1999) compared observed yields obtained from farmers' fields with and without contour hedgerows and found that the use of hedgerow technology did not constitute an unambiguously dominant production strategy. Yet, Bekele (2005), using SDA and results from experimental trials of the Soil Conservation Research Project in a low-rainfall 1 Literally, fanya juu means "throw soil uphill" in Swahili. In a fanya juu bund, a ditch is dug along a contour around a plot, and the soil is thrown uphill to form a ridge to block soil movements.…”