2010
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2010.2050225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Flash Analog-to-Digital Conversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SF-ADC uses comparators' input offsets as reference levels and so does not require any offset cancellation or calibration. The comparator is designed with minimum sized transistors in [8] and any offset cancellation is not used. This leads to decreasing the area occupation.…”
Section: Sf-adc and Its Linearization Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SF-ADC uses comparators' input offsets as reference levels and so does not require any offset cancellation or calibration. The comparator is designed with minimum sized transistors in [8] and any offset cancellation is not used. This leads to decreasing the area occupation.…”
Section: Sf-adc and Its Linearization Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has led to the proposal of stochastic flash ADCs (SFADCs), which apply the statistical nature of comparator offsets to detect signals below the offset level thereby maintain good dynamic range even in fine-process devices with substantial mismatch [8,9,10]. This technique originates from a detection principle of small signal with noise, so-called stochastic resonance [11,12,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a new ADC, referred to as the stochastic ADC, has been reported [5]. It uses device mismatch based on similar architectures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In circuit system research, [3] presents a design that explores the idea of high resolution quantization. Assuming uniform input over [−σ, σ], their design corresponds to n in the range of 1000 to 2000, and τ (x) = δ (x − 1.078σ) /2 + δ (x + 1.078σ) /2, with the rationale of making the resulting density λ = τ * φ as uniform as possible in the signal range [−σ, σ].…”
Section: B Comparison With Stochastic Adcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is motivated by Analogto-Digital Converter (ADC) design with imperfect comparators, where the comparator reference voltages are subject to stochastic manufacture variations, which becomes increasing salient as modern CMOS design approaches the physical limits of scaling. A series of work in circuit systems [1]- [3] have employed redundancy and/or reconfigurability to tackle this issue, in the context of Flash ADC design. On the other hand, While there exists some theoretical investigation of imperfect scalar quantizer and ADC (e.g., see [4] and the references therein), they treat the ADC design as given and aim to improve the quantization (estimation) performance via post processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%