1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf00258078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic independence, causal independence, and shieldability

Abstract: The aim of the paper is to explicate the concept of causal independence between sets of factors and Reichenbach 's screening-Qff-relation in probabilistic terms along the lines of Suppes' probabilistic theory of causality (1970). The probabilistic concept central to this task is that of conditional stochastic independence. The adequacy of the explication is supported by proving some theorems about the explicata which correspond to our intuitions about the explicanda.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(12) yields 2 The graphoid axioms are axioms of conditional independence, first formulated by Dawid [3] and Spohn [4]. Their connections to graph connectivity and to other notions of "information relevance" were established by Pearl and Paz [5] …”
Section: Deriving Testables From Non-testablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(12) yields 2 The graphoid axioms are axioms of conditional independence, first formulated by Dawid [3] and Spohn [4]. Their connections to graph connectivity and to other notions of "information relevance" were established by Pearl and Paz [5] …”
Section: Deriving Testables From Non-testablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not less important is the ability of these axioms to justify ignorability relations which a researcher may need for deriving causal effect estimands [1,8,11,12]. 4 Consider the sentence Z x ? ?…”
Section: Deriving Ignorability Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The axioms for semi-graphoids are presented in Pearl (1988, 82-90). They first occur in Dawid (1979) and Spohn (1980). For details on the d-separation criterion, see Pearl (1988, 117-118), Neapolitan (1990, 202-207) and Jensen (1996, 12-14).…”
Section: Modeling Confirmation With a Ltfr Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e intended interpretation of I(X, Y r Z ) (read X is independent of Y given Z ) is that having observed Z, no additional information about X could be obtained by also observing Y. For example, in a probabilistic model (Dawid 1979, Geiger et al 1991, Lauritzen et al 1990, Spohn 1980, Studeny! 1989…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%