2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40072-018-0125-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger equations on tori

Abstract: We consider the stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger equations (SNLS) posed on d-dimensional tori with either additive or multiplicative stochastic forcing. In particular, for the one-dimensional cubic SNLS, we prove global well-posedness in L 2 (T). As for other power-type nonlinearities, namely (i) (super)quintic when d = 1 and (ii) (super)cubic when d ≥ 2, we prove local well-posedness in all scaling-subcritical Sobolev spaces and global well-posedness in the energy space for the defocusing, energy-subcritical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, their argument cannot be transfered to higher dimensions. After this work was finished, we learned about a recent paper [12] by Cheung and Mosincat. Using the additional structure in the special case of the d-dimensional torus M = T d and algebraic nonlinearities, i.e.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, their argument cannot be transfered to higher dimensions. After this work was finished, we learned about a recent paper [12] by Cheung and Mosincat. Using the additional structure in the special case of the d-dimensional torus M = T d and algebraic nonlinearities, i.e.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then it is easy to see that φ ∈ HS(L 2 ; H s ) if and only if s < α − 1 2 . In particular, when α > 1 2 , the L 2 well-posedness theory in [11] is readily applicable and we conclude that (1.1) is globally well-posed in L 2 (T) in this case. When α ≤ 1 2 , however, the stochastic convolution lies almost surely outside L 2 (T) (for fixed t 0), which causes a serious issue in studying (1.1) with rough noises.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In particular, it was shown in [11] that (1.1) is locally well-posed in L 2 (T), provided that φ ∈ HS(L 2 ; L 2 ). The argument in [11] is based on (a slight modification of) the L 2 -local theory by Bourgain [6] and controlling the stochastic convolution in the relevant X s,b -norm (see Lemma 3.1 below). A standard application of Ito's lemma combined with the conservation of the L 2 -norm for the deterministic NLS (1.5) yields an a priori bound on the L 2 -norm of a solution and thus global well-posedness of (1.1) in L 2 (T).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, N and an R N − valued Lévy process L(t) := (L 1 (t), · · · , L N (t)) with pure jump defined as Before we describe our approach and state our result in detail, we would like to give a general overview of the literature on the stochastic NLS. In the two previous decades, existence and uniqueness results for the stochastic NLS with Gaussian noise have been treated in many articles, most notably [dBD99], [dBD03], [BRZ14], [BRZ16], [Hor18b] in the R d -setting, [BM14] for general 2D compact manifolds and [CM18] for the d-dimensional torus T d . In these articles, the authors applied Strichartz estimates in a fixed point argument based on the mild formulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%