2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.07.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic optimization of a multi-feedstock lignocellulosic-based bioethanol supply chain under multiple uncertainties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Compare Figure 5 to Figure 3, it is observed that the locations of fast pyrolysis plants are more centralized when availability factor δ is equal to 0.7 and we only need 40 counties (rather than 71 when δ is equal to 0.4) to supply the biomass. These results not only illustrate the phenomena that the locations of fast pyrolysis plants are sensitive to uncertainties, but also suggest that the optimal supply chain decisions will be improved by increasing biomass availability due to the additional fl in choosing the biomass harvesting sites and consequently reduction of total system cost [32,17]. Table 5 shows the value of the stochastic solution (VSS) will decrease as the availability factor increase.…”
Section: Discussion On the Impact Of Farmers' Participationmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compare Figure 5 to Figure 3, it is observed that the locations of fast pyrolysis plants are more centralized when availability factor δ is equal to 0.7 and we only need 40 counties (rather than 71 when δ is equal to 0.4) to supply the biomass. These results not only illustrate the phenomena that the locations of fast pyrolysis plants are sensitive to uncertainties, but also suggest that the optimal supply chain decisions will be improved by increasing biomass availability due to the additional fl in choosing the biomass harvesting sites and consequently reduction of total system cost [32,17]. Table 5 shows the value of the stochastic solution (VSS) will decrease as the availability factor increase.…”
Section: Discussion On the Impact Of Farmers' Participationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Alex et al formulated a mixed integer linear programming model to determine optimal locations and capacities of biorefi [16]. Osmani et al used stochastic optimization to deal with the uncertainties in biomass yield and price as well as biofuel demand and price [17]. As a recent advancement in the cellulosic biofuel technology, decentralized supply chain design for thermochemical pathways have not been studied extensively, especially scenario under uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are compared with those of a deterministic model using simulation technique. Osmani and Zhang (2013) developed a two-stage stochastic MILP for decision making in a multi-feedstock bioethanol supply chain. In the first stage, strategic decisions such as location and production capacity of biorefineries and allocation of farmlands for biomass cultivation are made.…”
Section: Studies With Single Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They solved their model by benders decomposition and Monte Carlo simulation technique and in order to compare its performance, they compared the model with simulation methods. Osmani and Zhang (2013) proposed a two-stage stochastic MILP model to minimize profit. Their multi-feedstock model addresses the strategic decisions such as location, production capacity, and allocation in the first phase and tactical decisions are made in the second phase.…”
Section: Lp Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%