2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2011.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic orders in time transformed exponential models with applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the involved densities being defined in (9), (22), and (23). Since X and Y describe the random lifetimes of two systems, M X,Y (s, t) measures the dependence between their remaining lifetimes at different ages s and t. See the analogy between (24) and the mutual information of…”
Section: Mutual Information For Residual Lifetimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the involved densities being defined in (9), (22), and (23). Since X and Y describe the random lifetimes of two systems, M X,Y (s, t) measures the dependence between their remaining lifetimes at different ages s and t. See the analogy between (24) and the mutual information of…”
Section: Mutual Information For Residual Lifetimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recall that a pair of random lifetimes (X, Y ) is said to follow the time-transformed exponential (TTE) model if its joint survival function may be expressed in the following way: [4], [22], [24], [28], and [31]. Hereafter, we investigate the bivariate dynamic residual mutual information within the TTE model.…”
Section: Dynamic Mutual Information For the Time-transformed Exponentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We recall that a pair of random lifetimes (X, Y ) is said to follow the time-transformed exponential (TTE) model if its joint survival function may be expressed in the following way: [4], [22], [24], [28], and [31].…”
Section: Dynamic Mutual Information For Time-transformed Exponential mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the given assumptions the densities in (9), (22), and (23) can still be expressed respectively as in (38) for 0 ≤ x ≤ R −1 1 (ω −R 2 (t))−s, as in (39) for 0 ≤ y ≤ R −1 2 (ω −R 1 (s))−t, and as in (40) for all nonnegative x, y such that R 1 (x + s) + R 2 (y + t) ≤ ω. Note that the assumption W ′ (ω) = 0 is essential to ascertain that the integral of f X,Y (x, y; s, t) is unity.…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%