2017
DOI: 10.5120/ijca2017913453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock Prediction using Machine Learning a Review Paper

Abstract: Every day more than 5000 trade companies enlisted in Bombay stock Exchange (BSE) offer an average of 24,00,00,000+ stocks, making an approximate of 2000Cr+ Indian rupees in investments. Thus analyzing such a huge market will prove beneficial to all stakeholders of the system. An application which focuses on the patterns generated in this stock trade over the period of time, and extracting the knowledge from those patterns to predict future behavior of the BSE stock market is essential. An application represent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To predict stock prices, many researchers have developed methods, but only a few have developed a trading strategy. Some of the reviews of the developed methods are published [1,2]. For example, Shah et al classified stock prediction methods into four categories: statistical methods, pattern recognition, machine learning, and sentiment analysis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To predict stock prices, many researchers have developed methods, but only a few have developed a trading strategy. Some of the reviews of the developed methods are published [1,2]. For example, Shah et al classified stock prediction methods into four categories: statistical methods, pattern recognition, machine learning, and sentiment analysis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This particularly holds true for statistical, pattern recognition, machine learning, and sentiment analysis approaches, alongside some hybrid techniques. There is no unequivocal voice among scholars and practitioners about the best approach, since some authors advocate statistical (see Islam and Nguyen 2020) whereas other advocate for machine learning approaches (see Singh et al 2017, Nõu et al 2023.…”
Section: Athens Journal Of Technology and Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Chung et al (10) showed that GRU outperformed LSTM in many tasks, and Chen L. (11) found that GRU was better at many tasks than LSTM, except for language modeling. Shewalar et al (12) found that LSTM was better at the voice recognition test than GRU, but they admit that GRU is faster. Faster optimization is one of the advantages of GRU over LSTM because it has fewer parameters.…”
Section: Gated Recurrent Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%