2019
DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock Returns over the FOMC Cycle

Abstract: We document that since 1994, the equity premium is earned entirely in weeks 0, 2, 4, and 6 in Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) cycle time, that is, even weeks starting from the last FOMC meeting. We causally tie this fact to the Fed by studying intermeeting target changes, Fed funds futures, and internal Board of Governors meetings. The Fed has affected the stock market via unexpectedly accommodating policy, leading to large reductions in the equity premium. Evidence suggests systematic informal communicat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Central banks' communication, and its impact on financial market, has been analysed for developed countries in numerous papers using typically the data from the United States and the European Union relying mainly on the Federal Reserve Board (FED) and the European Central Bank (ECB) monetary policy decisions (see the evidence published in Bernanke and Kuttner (2005), Wongswan (2009), Hausman and Wongswan (2011), Bekaert et al . (2013), Lucca and Moench (2015) and more recently in Cieślak et al . (2019), among many others) [5].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Central banks' communication, and its impact on financial market, has been analysed for developed countries in numerous papers using typically the data from the United States and the European Union relying mainly on the Federal Reserve Board (FED) and the European Central Bank (ECB) monetary policy decisions (see the evidence published in Bernanke and Kuttner (2005), Wongswan (2009), Hausman and Wongswan (2011), Bekaert et al . (2013), Lucca and Moench (2015) and more recently in Cieślak et al . (2019), among many others) [5].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Our findings are generally consistent with the results from developed markets (such as Bernanke and Kuttner, 2005; Bekaert et al ., 2013; Lucca and Moench, 2015; Cieślak et al ., 2019) and with previous studies using emerging market data from Poland. In particular, our paper reports similar effects of the central banks' communications as the earlier studies by Brzeszczyński and Kutan (2015) and Brzeszczyński et al (2017), which also detected statistically significant reactions of different financial instruments to the NBP announcements with interest rates and money supply as the most influential type of news.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S öderlind and Svensson (1997) provide an early discussion of the reflection 2 For example, the Bank of England has recently established a Market Intelligence Charter outlining the standards it expects from its staff when liaising with market participants (Jeffery et al, 2017). Cieślak et al (2019) provide evidence of financial institutions receiving systematic preferential access to the Federal Reserve.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central banks' communication, and its impact on financial markets, was however analysed in different contexts in the studies using typically the data from the US and the European Union relying mainly on the Federal Reserve Board (FED) and the European Central Bank (ECB) monetary policy decisions (see the evidence published in Bernanke and Kuttner (2005), Wongswan (2009), Hausman and Wongswan (2011), Bekaert, Hoerova and Lo Duca (2013), Lucca and Moench (2015) and more recently in Cieslak, Morse and Vissing-Jorgensen (2020), among others).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%