1981
DOI: 10.1063/1.329448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stoichiometric disturbances in ion implanted compound semiconductors

Abstract: Disturbances in the stoichiometry of compound semiconductors which result from ion implantation are calculated using a Boltzmann transport equation approach. Results for 50-keV boron, 150-keV silicon, and 400-keV selenium implanted into silicon carbide, indium phosphide, and gallium arsenide are presented. Possible complications in the annealing of such implants are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the vacancies are likely to stay closer to the surface, the interstitials are supposed to be in excess at the end of range of the implanted ions. 9,10 Moreover, according to the theoretical work of Christel and Gibbons, 9 it is expected that the distribution profile for the N interstitials ͑N i ͒ will be displaced to a greater depth with respect to that of the Ga interstitials ͑Ga i ͒. It is plausible that the two peaks observed in this case are stemming from the different parts of the interstitial dominated zone; peak 1 is originating from the region which is dominated by both Ga i and N i , while the origin of peak 2 is the tail section of the N i distribution profile, as shown in the inset of the figure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the vacancies are likely to stay closer to the surface, the interstitials are supposed to be in excess at the end of range of the implanted ions. 9,10 Moreover, according to the theoretical work of Christel and Gibbons, 9 it is expected that the distribution profile for the N interstitials ͑N i ͒ will be displaced to a greater depth with respect to that of the Ga interstitials ͑Ga i ͒. It is plausible that the two peaks observed in this case are stemming from the different parts of the interstitial dominated zone; peak 1 is originating from the region which is dominated by both Ga i and N i , while the origin of peak 2 is the tail section of the N i distribution profile, as shown in the inset of the figure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proper reconstruction of the damaged InP lattice depends on the availability of both constituent atoms in the correct proportions near the interface between damaged and recrystallized regions. 25 The significant phosphorus loss occurring during annealing, 26 as well as the greater range of recoiling for P atoms compared to In atoms, 26 may be important factors preventing a greater degree of recrystallization in InP samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the stoichiometric disturbances caused by ion-implantation in compound semiconductors are in the form of lattice vacancies at the surface. 20,27,28 The concentration of vacancies at the surface increases with the atomic mass of the implant species. Since As and Sb are heavier than N and P, the concentration of Si and C vacancies at the surface is greater than the peak-implant concentration.…”
Section: Arsenic and Antimony Implantations In 6h-sic Epilayersmentioning
confidence: 99%