2009
DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2009.9664342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stomach Capacities of Six Freshwater Fishes

Abstract: We investigated the relationship between stomach capacity and total body length in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus), spotted bass (Micropterus punctulatus), white crappie (Pornoxis annularis), black crappie (Pornoxis nigrornaculatus), channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), and white bass (Morone chrysops). The rate of change in stomach capacity for a given change in fish length was greatest for spotted bass and channel catfish, which may indicate greater ontogenetic shifts in feeding strategies. Fish with larger… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gape limitation likely affected consumption rate on white perch more in Pawnee Lake than in Branched Oak Lake because predators were smaller (Gosch et al, 2010) and white perch were larger in Pawnee Lake (Chizinski et al, 2010). When predators are not gape-limited, stomach capacity (i.e., how much the stomach can hold) could be another physical limitation on consumption (Truemper and Lauer, 2005;Gosch et al, 2009). Other factors such as growth rate of predators and prey, predator hunting mode, prey avoidance behavior, and habitat overlap between predators and prey could also influence consumption rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gape limitation likely affected consumption rate on white perch more in Pawnee Lake than in Branched Oak Lake because predators were smaller (Gosch et al, 2010) and white perch were larger in Pawnee Lake (Chizinski et al, 2010). When predators are not gape-limited, stomach capacity (i.e., how much the stomach can hold) could be another physical limitation on consumption (Truemper and Lauer, 2005;Gosch et al, 2009). Other factors such as growth rate of predators and prey, predator hunting mode, prey avoidance behavior, and habitat overlap between predators and prey could also influence consumption rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the limits imposed by gape size, fishes with big stomachs should be able to feed on a wider range of prey sizes than fishes with small stomachs (e.g. Gosch et al 2009), but when the stomach is partially full, fish might choose small rather than large food items (Truemper and Lauer 2005). In this study, the relationship between average prey size and stomach fullness was positive, but was only statistically significant for the exponential model, suggesting that trout may be able to use relatively large food items regardless of their stomach fullness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stomach capacity was estimated by plotting sample volume (i.e. the cumulative volume of all prey items in a stomach) by total length similar to Gosch et al (2009). Fish were divided into their respective length groups, and an exponential regression was fit to the largest data point within each length group to predict maximum stomach capacity based on fish length.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%