2006
DOI: 10.1350/ijps.2006.8.2.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stop and Search in 2004: A Survey of Police Officer Views and Experiences

Abstract: The capacity to stop and search citizens is a key part of the police crime reduction repertoire. This study presents findings from a survey of all police officers at one

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study examines the use of stop and search in Scotland, where the practice has been under increased scrutiny in recent years (e.g., Genevieve & Murray, 2018), but comparatively little has been written about it versus England and the United States (cf., McAra & McVie, 2005). This research extends existing work on police officer perspectives on stop and search (e.g., Qureshi & Farrell, 2006) and civilian views on the practice in isolation (e.g., Smith & Gray, 1985), by comparing and contrasting the views of officers conducting the searches with the views of young people who are subject to them. Based on qualitative fieldwork and interviews with officers and civilians, we examine the extent to which officers believe in the tactic and how much stop and search procedures in Scotland are underpinned by a focus on procedural justice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The current study examines the use of stop and search in Scotland, where the practice has been under increased scrutiny in recent years (e.g., Genevieve & Murray, 2018), but comparatively little has been written about it versus England and the United States (cf., McAra & McVie, 2005). This research extends existing work on police officer perspectives on stop and search (e.g., Qureshi & Farrell, 2006) and civilian views on the practice in isolation (e.g., Smith & Gray, 1985), by comparing and contrasting the views of officers conducting the searches with the views of young people who are subject to them. Based on qualitative fieldwork and interviews with officers and civilians, we examine the extent to which officers believe in the tactic and how much stop and search procedures in Scotland are underpinned by a focus on procedural justice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Colwell, Miller, Lyons, and Miller (2006) find that officers state their formal and informal training for detecting deception occurred at the police academy, training seminars, ''on the job,'' through college or university courses, and based on ''life experiences.'' Similarly, the research by Qureshi and Farrell (2006) on training for vehicle stops and searches finds training on this aspect of police work occurring in formal classes, daily briefings, as well as ''practical'' types of training (i.e., informal guidance received from fellow officers). Researcher-driven studies discuss police training within the categories of academy and in-service training (i.e., refresher, requalification, advanced, and career development training for promotion purposes).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been numerous published documents recounting the history of the development of stop and search legislation and reforms (e.g. see Delsol & Shiner, 2006;Reid, 2009;Sanders & Young, 2007;Qureshi et al, 2006), so this section of the article will focus on issues directly concerned with s 1 of PACE's 'reasonable grounds for suspicion' in the stop and search context. Section 1 of PACE 1984 was criticised in a number of ways; for example, for failing to regulate the discretionary practices of police officers, for the lack of consideration for informal working practices during street-level policing and for the lack of clarity regarding the criteria for reasonable suspicion (Dixon et al, 1989;McConville et al, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%