Stories affording new pathways: bridging the divide between aged and disability care

Dawson, Patrick; Sykes, Christopher; McLean, Peter D.; Zanko, Michael; Marciano, Heather

doi:10.1108/jocm-12-2013-0245

Cited by 7 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Examples of bridging tasks that were being discussed currently in practice were mandated joint planning initiatives between sectors [24], specific personnel such as registered nurses in ID who have the capacity to bridge aging and ID [36], and funding for cross-disability research and training centers on aging with a disability [64]. Bridging tasks reviewed in original research studies included pilot projects involving joint programming between disability services client and aged care residents [34,47], a palliative care educational program for staff caring for those with Intellectual Disabilities [37], and area agencies incorporating linkages with Developmental Disability agencies [46]. Examples of bridging tasks that were being called for were policy development and funding mechanisms covering aging and disability housing services, to enable aging in place for those with I/DD [26], training across staff regarding physical, cognitive and social changes in older adults with disabilities [8,39] and collecting data from individuals aging with disability to determine unmet needs and identify best practices [7].…”

Section: Perspectives Of Bridging Tasks Discussedmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At the macro level, bridging activities were related to funded research programs, and either national-or international-level planning and awareness raising through major events/conferences discussing intersecting and overlapping issues related to aging and disability [31,45]. At the meso level, bridging involved planning and collaboration, research related to local consumer needs to inform planning activities, as well as education of health professionals [34,37]. Conversely, at the micro level, bridging related to more specific training and mentoring of health professionals, so that those working in disability field could enhance their knowledge of aging Frameworks, models, theories [6] Specific models and/or theories influencing beliefs regarding aging and/or disability, change processes, and/or service delivery/policy needs.…”

Section: Bridging Tasks Organized Temporally and By Level Of Carementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A scoping review to characterize bridging tasks in the literature on aging with disability

Nalder

Saumur

Batliwalla

et al. 2020

BMC Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Bridging involves improving knowledge sharing and collaboration across different fields, such as aging and disability. The objectives of this review were to describe: 1) the contexts where bridging has occurred in relation to delivery of health services for adults aging with neurological or developmental conditions; and 2) characterize and map bridging tasks, stakeholders involved, and outcomes discussed in peer-reviewed literature.Methods: Seven databases were searched around the core concepts of "bridging," "aging," and "disability." In total, 10, 819 articles were screened with 49 meeting the inclusion criteria of discussing aging with developmental or neurological disability, explicitly describing bridging tasks, published in English and a peer-reviewed publication. Bibliographic information, sample characteristics, and data on bridging was extracted and included in the qualitative synthesis. Results: Intellectual and/or Developmental disabilities were the most studied population (76% of articles), and most articles were published in the United States (57%). Twenty-two bridging tasks were identified, and categorized into three domains: health and social service delivery (e.g., care coordination tasks), policy (e.g., policy change), and research and training (e.g., mentoring). Stakeholders involved ranged from health care professionals to policy makers and organizations in aging and disability services. Conclusions:The resulting matrix will assist in the specification of bridging in research and practice. Future work should evaluate specific models of bridging and their effects on health service delivery. BackgroundBridging as a field of scientific knowledge considers how silos can be broken down, and how individuals from different fields can work together sharing their knowledge and skills to address complex issues. 'Aging with disability' refers to the study of the processes and experiences of aging, in the context of long-term disability, and this notion has driven much of the interest in the construct of bridging in the health care setting [1,2]. In this article the concept of bridging is applied to the aging and disability fields [3].Bridging emerged in the context of increasingly complex health systems that need to adapt to rising demands and changing consumer needs. Aging populations place an added demand on health services, as rates of disability and health care utilization are high in older populations [2,4,5]. Simultaneously life expectancies have increased, meaning individuals living with disability acquired earlier in life may require services and supports to maintain their health and

show abstract

Section: Perspectives Of Bridging Tasks Discussedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Bridging Tasks Organized Temporally and By Level Of Carementioning

confidence: 99%

A scoping review to characterize bridging tasks in the literature on aging with disability

Nalder

Saumur

Batliwalla

et al. 2020

BMC Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Qualitative 46 92% Abolafia, 2010;Apker, 2004;Balogun, 2003Balogun, , 2006Balogun & Johnson, 2004Balogun et al, 2015;Bean & Eisenberg, 2006;Bean & Hamilton, 2006;Brown, & Humphreys, 2003;Chreim, 2006;Chreim & Tafaghod, 2012;Dawson et al, 2014;Dunford & Jones, 2000;Dutton et al, 2001;Gazi, 2013;Gioia & Chittipeddi, 1991;Gioia et al, 1994;Guiette & Vandenbernpt, 2013;Greenberg, 1995;Hensmans, 2015;Heracleous & Barrett, 2001;Hernes et al, 2015;Hope, 2010;Kezar, 2013;Kyriakidou, 2011;Isabella, 1990;Lockett et al, 2014;Luscher & Lewis, 2008;Maclean et al, 2014;Reissner, 2011;Riesenmy, 2010;Rouleau, 2005;Rouleau & Balogun, 2011;Smollan, 2014;Sonenshein, 2009;Sonenshein, 2010;Stensaker et al, 2008;Stensaker & Falkenberg, 2007;Stensaker & Meyer 2012;…”

Section: Referencesunclassified

“…Multiple groups 24 48% Apker, 2004;Bean & Eisenberg, 2006;Bean & Hamilton, 2006;Brown, & Humphreys, 2003;Chreim & Tafaghod, 2012;Dawson et al, 2014;Dutton et al, 2001;Gazi, 2013;Guiette & Vandenbernpt, 2013;Hensmans, 2015;Heracleous & Barrett, 2001;Isabella, 1990;Landau & Drori, 2008;Lockett et al, 2014;Reissner, 2011;Smollan, 2014;Sonenshein, 2009;Stensaker et al, 2008;Stensaker & Falkenberg, 2007;Stensaker & Meyer 2012;Thurlow & Helms-Mills, 2009;Weber & Manning, 2001;Wetzel & Dievernich, 2014 Middle managers only 10 20% Balogun , 2003Balogun , , 2006Balogun & Johnson, 2003Greenberg, 1995;Hope, 2010;Luscher & Lewis, 2008;Rouleau, 2005;Rouleau & Balogun, 2011;Teulier & Rouleau, 2013 Senior managers only 6 12% Balogun et al, 2015;Dunford & Jones, 2000;Gioia & Chittipeddi, 1991;Gioia et al, 1994;Gioia & Thomas, 1996;Maclean et...…”

Section: Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Observation 4 8% Abolafia, 2010;Bean & Eisenberg, 2006;Greenberg, 1995;Rouleau, 2005;Teulier & Rouleau, 2013 Interviews at one point in time 23 47% Apker, 2004;Chreim, 2006;Chreim & Tafaghod, 2012;Dawson et al, 2014;Dunford & Jones, 2000;Dutton et al, 2001;Gazi, 2013;Gioia & Chittipeddi, 1991;Guiette & Vandenbernpt, 2013;Hensmans, 2015;Hope, 2010;Isabella, 1990;Kyriakidou, 2011;Luscher & Lewis, 2008;Maclean et al, 2014;Reissner, 2011;Riesenmy, 2010;Rouleau & Balogun, 2011;Sonenshein, 2009, 2010010;Stensaker & Meyer, 2012;Thurlow & Helms-Mills, 2009;Wetzel & Dievernich, 2014 Interviews at >1 point in time (subthemes below):…”

Section: Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Insider Perspective: Three Emic Studies About Sensemaking and Organizational Change Over Time

Gover¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scholars contend that our understanding of organizational change would benefit from research that more closely represents the lived reality of organizational change.Research on sensemaking is particularly valuable in this vein because of its focus on the individual's experience and understanding. Existing empirical work on sensemaking about organizational change, however, is largely based on retrospective interview data and/or focuses on a narrow window of time during change implementation and thus does not thoroughly consider how individuals' make sense of change over time. This thesis seeks to address this limitation through three complementary studies aimed at understanding how individuals make sense of organizational change over time from an emic (or insider) perspective. All three papers are interpretive process-oriented case studies, which use grounded theory data analysis techniques to analyze interview data for the same 26 hospital employees collected at three points in time over a five year period of organizational change. Paper one is about the interpretation stage of sensemaking. This paper identifies four stable sensemaking lenses and develops two new concepts related to how individuals make sense of organizational change over time: (1) sensemaking constancy and (2) sensemaking scope. Paper two considers sensemaking triggers and explores how individuals' retrospective sensemaking compares to their real-time assessments during change. Findings indicated that in "real-time" the experience of change varied in somewhat stable way between groups but that when "looking back" over the change, change agents tended to view the changes more positively than change recipients. Finally, paper three looks at the enactment stage of the sensemaking process iii and examines individuals' strategies for coping with excessive change. Coping (from cognitive appraisal theory) and sensemaking are positioned as overlapping processes that individuals use to make sense of and respond to excessive organizational change. Five patterns, or stories about how individuals cope with and make sense of excessive change over time, emerged. Taken as a group, the three papers contribute to the research and practice of organizational change by offering novel insights and theoretical contributions related to how individuals experience and make sense of change over time. iv Preface I, Laura Gover, am the sole author of this dissertation and the lead author of each of the three papers. At the time of the initial thesis submission all three papers had been submitted for publication consideration at peer review journals. These three submissions, and any proceeding publications, all list Laura Gover as the first author and Dr. Linda Duxbury (my thesis supervisor) as the co-author. Dr. Linda Duxbury provided valuable guidance throughout this research process primarily by providing feedback, partaking in spirited discussions about the research decisions and direction and by offering editorial support. Aside from my thesis supervisor there are no o...

show abstract

Patrick Dawson: Organizational Change as a Nonlinear, Ongoing, Dynamic Process

Sykes¹

2016

The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stories affording new pathways: bridging the divide between aged and disability care

Cited by 7 publications

References 56 publications

A scoping review to characterize bridging tasks in the literature on aging with disability

A scoping review to characterize bridging tasks in the literature on aging with disability

The Insider Perspective: Three Emic Studies About Sensemaking and Organizational Change Over Time

Patrick Dawson: Organizational Change as a Nonlinear, Ongoing, Dynamic Process

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About