2000
DOI: 10.1108/09513570010323245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storing and shielding: financial management behaviour in a church organization

Abstract: Financial managers in public entities have been portrayed as acting as “guardians” of the resources of the organization. However, while the private not‐for‐profit literature makes reference to perceptions of such behaviour, it has presented little detailed evidence of these roles. This study utilises a field‐based case study to examine the nature of this behaviour typology within the context of a significant Australian religious organization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0
11

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
84
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Booth (1993, p. 56) concurred with Hinings and Foster (1973) that if funds are short, there is a tendency to "conserve and control" them, while Lightbody (2000) identified "storing" mechanisms to conserve funds, and "shielding" procedures to hide them from view. Laughlin (1988) likewise observed that resistance to the use of accounting in the Church of England could be reduced during times of financial stress.…”
Section: Organizational Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Booth (1993, p. 56) concurred with Hinings and Foster (1973) that if funds are short, there is a tendency to "conserve and control" them, while Lightbody (2000) identified "storing" mechanisms to conserve funds, and "shielding" procedures to hide them from view. Laughlin (1988) likewise observed that resistance to the use of accounting in the Church of England could be reduced during times of financial stress.…”
Section: Organizational Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mais il nous semble que l'étude des rapports entre les managers financiers et les défenseurs de la mission dans une organisation religieuse (Lightbody, 2000) présente un caractère faussement novateur. En effet, cette question, formulée par Laughlin (1988) et Booth (1993, est devenue centrale dans les recherches sur la comptabilité des organisations religieuses (McPhail, et al, 2004(McPhail, et al, , 2005.…”
Section: Des Questions De Recherche Nouvelles Et D'autres Faussement unclassified
“…Six articles optent pour une méthodologie par entretiens (Lightbody, 2000, Norris, 2002, Goddard, 2004, Goddard et Assad, 2006, Solomon et Solomon, 2006, Efferin et Hopper, 2007 Lorsque la pratique de la grounded theory consiste seulement en la conduite d'entretiens, ceux-ci sont généralement enregistrés et retranscrits (Lightbody, 2000 ;Norris, 2002 ;Goddard, 2004 ;Goddard et Assad, 2006 ;Solomon et Solomon, 2006). Lorsque l'enregistrement n'est pas permis, les réponses aux questions font l'objet d'une première synthèse avant d'être complétées par d'autres entretiens (Efferin et Hopper, 2007).…”
Section: Les éTudes Par Entretiensunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This sacred-secular paradigm has been influential in attempting to understand the role of accounting and accountability practices within religious bodies despite criticism of its theoretical framing (Hardy and Ballis 2005;Jacobs 2005), alleged internal inconsistency (Hardy and Ballis 2005) and doubts about its ability to provide scholars with the means to interpret the specific context of a variety of religious institutions (Abdul-Raham and Goddart 1998;Cordery 2006;Ezzamel 2005;Fonfeder et al 2003;Jacobs and Walker 2005;Lightbody 2000;Irvine 2005). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%