2006
DOI: 10.1029/2006ja011690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storm time evolution of the outer radiation belt: Transport and losses

Abstract: [1] During geomagnetic storms the magnetic field of the inner magnetosphere exhibits large-scale variations over timescales from minutes to days. Being mainly controlled by the magnetic field the motion of relativistic electrons of the outer radiation belt can be highly susceptible to its variations. This paper investigates evolution of the outer belt during the 7 September 2002 storm. Evolution of electron phase space density is calculated with the use of a test-particle simulation in storm time magnetic and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
178
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
178
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kim and Chan 1997), which can become a real loss of particles at the magnetopause (e.g. West et al 1972;Hudson et al 1998;Ukhorskiy et al 2006). This process has been identified as contributing rapid loss for up to 90% of the pre-existing population of both radiation belt electrons (100's keV to multi-MeV) energies and energetic ring current protons (100's keV to >1 MeV) .…”
Section: Ring Current and Radiation Beltsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim and Chan 1997), which can become a real loss of particles at the magnetopause (e.g. West et al 1972;Hudson et al 1998;Ukhorskiy et al 2006). This process has been identified as contributing rapid loss for up to 90% of the pre-existing population of both radiation belt electrons (100's keV to multi-MeV) energies and energetic ring current protons (100's keV to >1 MeV) .…”
Section: Ring Current and Radiation Beltsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible resolutions include: qualitatively similar processes evaluated with better models of radial diffusion and cyclotron-resonant waves; non-diffusive radial transport (Ukhorskiy et al, 2006); non-resonant interactions with EMIC or other waves (Bortnik and Thorne, 2010); and nondiffusive wave-particle interactions (e.g., Albert, 2000;Albert et al, 2012). It has been noted in many test particle simulations that nonlinear interactions with large amplitude, resonant whistler waves lead to a preferential, rapid decrease in pitch angle, accompanied by decrease in energy (Albert, 2002;Tao et al, 2012); this could also be manifested as a loss process.…”
Section: J Albert: Diffusion Simulations 5 Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In storm recovery, however, flux levels can increase to levels greatly exceeding their pre-storm values (e.g., Reeves et al, 2003). Since flux depletions at storm main phase are most likely dominated by permanent losses (Ukhorskiy et al, 2006a), the after-storm flux increases require radial transport and subsequent heating of energetic electrons from the outer to the inner magnetospheric regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%