1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.56.4696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain distribution and electronic spectra of InAs/GaAs self-assembled dots: An eight-band study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
187
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 323 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
187
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the pyramid shape symmetry group is a subgroup of the symmetry of the zincblende crystal lattice, it follows that the symmetry group of the model is the double C 4 group 17 . Two different approaches are used to calculate the strain distribution in quantum dots -the continuum mechanical 8,11 and the valence force field model 8,10 . When the strain distribution is incorporated in the k · p method, the continuum mechanical model preserves the C 4 symmetry, while the valence force field model, due to its atomistic nature, breaks it 8,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the pyramid shape symmetry group is a subgroup of the symmetry of the zincblende crystal lattice, it follows that the symmetry group of the model is the double C 4 group 17 . Two different approaches are used to calculate the strain distribution in quantum dots -the continuum mechanical 8,11 and the valence force field model 8,10 . When the strain distribution is incorporated in the k · p method, the continuum mechanical model preserves the C 4 symmetry, while the valence force field model, due to its atomistic nature, breaks it 8,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two different approaches are used to calculate the strain distribution in quantum dots -the continuum mechanical 8,11 and the valence force field model 8,10 . When the strain distribution is incorporated in the k · p method, the continuum mechanical model preserves the C 4 symmetry, while the valence force field model, due to its atomistic nature, breaks it 8,10 . Nevertheless, the comparisons of the two models have shown that they give similar results 8,18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 As quantum dots were grown on a GaAs͑001͒ substrate by metalorganic chemical-vapor deposition using a horizontal reactor cell operating at 76 Torr. For the growth of In x Ga 1Ϫx As islands, (CH 3 ) 3 Ga 3 , (CH 3 ) 3 In, and AsH 3 were used as precursors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The k · p model is the most popular one for treating electronic structures of semiconductor quantum wells or superlattices. However, when applied to complex structures such as self-assembled quantum wires [4][5][6][7][8][9] or quantum dots [13,18,19], the method becomes very cumbersome if one wish to implement the correct boundary conditions that take into account the differences in k · p band parameters for different materials involved. EBOM is free of this problem, since different material parameters are used at different atomic sites in a natural way.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By varying the parameters A valence force field (VFF) model [13][14][15] is used to find the equilibrium atomic positions in the self-assembled QWR structure by minimizing the lattice energy. The strain tensor at each atomic (In or Ga) site is then obtained by calculating the local distortion of chemical bonds.…”
Section: Model Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%