2002
DOI: 10.5194/smsps-1-93-2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain partitioning in front of an obliquely convergent indenter

Abstract: Abstract.A model is presented that combines the traditional approach to transpression with the thin viscous sheet approximation of the lithosphere, to study deformation in front of an obliquely colliding indenter. The model produces a zone dominated by lateral simple shear (orogen parallel transcurrent movements) close to the indenter and a zone of dominant pure shear (orogen perpendicular pure shear/thrusting regions) further away from the indenting boundary. The relative width of simple shear dominated zone … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variable intensity of the D2 deformation and associated metamorphism can be interpreted in terms of a progressive indentation of the OSD from the east by a continental promontory (Figure 13c). The resulting strain distribution in front of an oblique indenter was successfully modeled by Ježek et al [2002] and Lexa et al [2003], though this model generates a finite strain pattern without folding. Alternatively, Bott and Dean [1973] and Blay et al [1977] proposed a model of progressive deformation and stress transfer across a visco‐elastic plate leading to progressive fold propagation away from the indenter as the early folds lock up and harden during progressive shortening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable intensity of the D2 deformation and associated metamorphism can be interpreted in terms of a progressive indentation of the OSD from the east by a continental promontory (Figure 13c). The resulting strain distribution in front of an oblique indenter was successfully modeled by Ježek et al [2002] and Lexa et al [2003], though this model generates a finite strain pattern without folding. Alternatively, Bott and Dean [1973] and Blay et al [1977] proposed a model of progressive deformation and stress transfer across a visco‐elastic plate leading to progressive fold propagation away from the indenter as the early folds lock up and harden during progressive shortening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most of the natural orogens accommodates transpressional deformation, with orogen-parallel tectonic transport in response to oblique convergence (Jezek et al 2002). In the transpressive shear zones (Harland 1971), the concept of strain partitioning is characterized into zones of simple shear deformation and domains of pure shear (Tikoff and Teyssier 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is characteristic of a viscous deformation gradient typically developed in front of the moving piston (e.g. Houseman, 1986, 1989;Ježek et al, 2002). The EJTA crust-mantle interface (section 5) is irregularly deformed and shows upright cuspate folds further away from the piston.…”
Section: Sections Parallel To the Shortening Direction (Ie Perpendicular To The Orocline Axial Plane)mentioning
confidence: 94%