2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.06.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain rate sensitivity of Sn–3.0Ag–0.5Cu solder investigated by nanoindentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, depth-sensing indentation (DSI) has become widely accepted as an alternative approach for mechanically characterizing bulk solids due to the associated simple sample preparation and the need for only a very small volume of testing material [26]. The use of DSI provides an opportunity for measuring the SRS using nanoindentation testing and recently there are reports describing the measuring of SRS from nanoindentation of various UFG metals including Al [27,28], Cu [28,29], Mg alloys [30,31], Ni [28], Sn-Ag-Cu [32], Zn-Al [28,33] a CoCrFeNiMn high-entropy alloy [34,35] and an AlMg nanocomposite [36]. However, an evaluation shows that relatively little information is available comparing the values of the SRS measured for the same material using conventional tensile testing and nanoindentation and it is reasonable to anticipate that these two different straining conditions may affect the measurements of SRS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, depth-sensing indentation (DSI) has become widely accepted as an alternative approach for mechanically characterizing bulk solids due to the associated simple sample preparation and the need for only a very small volume of testing material [26]. The use of DSI provides an opportunity for measuring the SRS using nanoindentation testing and recently there are reports describing the measuring of SRS from nanoindentation of various UFG metals including Al [27,28], Cu [28,29], Mg alloys [30,31], Ni [28], Sn-Ag-Cu [32], Zn-Al [28,33] a CoCrFeNiMn high-entropy alloy [34,35] and an AlMg nanocomposite [36]. However, an evaluation shows that relatively little information is available comparing the values of the SRS measured for the same material using conventional tensile testing and nanoindentation and it is reasonable to anticipate that these two different straining conditions may affect the measurements of SRS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. The fluctuation and instability of the elastic modulus and hardness are caused by the indentation size effect [20]. Onitsch [22] proposed that the size effect depended on grain size of material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three common ways to carry out indentation tests; namely, with constant load (P), constant loading rate ð _ PÞ, and with constant strain rate ð_ ε; i:e:; CSMÞ. It has been proposed that the constant indentation strain rate condition should be applied by performing load-controlled indentations with a constant loading rate ð _ P=PÞ [19,20]. To understand the effect of strain rate on the micromechanical behavior of the ceramics, indentation tests were performed based on CSM under five loading rates ð _ P=PÞ of 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 s À 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon the maximum depth, the indenter was held for 10 s prior to the unloading stage until the full recovery of indentation. The holding stage is important to alleviate the creep effect and ensure the elastic deformation in the unloading stage [11].…”
Section: Long Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%