2018
DOI: 10.1094/pdis-06-17-0901-re
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain-Specific Hypersensitive and Extreme Resistance Phenotypes Elicited by Potato virus Y Among 39 Potato Cultivars Released in Three World Regions Over a 117-Year Period

Abstract: Strain-specific hypersensitive (HR) and extreme resistance (ER) phenotypes elicited in potato plants by three Potato virus Y (PVY) isolates in strain groups PVYO (BL and DEL3) and PVYD (KIP1) were studied. PVYO and PVYD isolates elicit HR genes Ny or putative Nd, respectively, and all three isolates elicit ER gene Ry. They were inoculated to 39 Australasian, European, or North American potato cultivars released over a 117-year period and harvested tubers were replanted. Both primary and secondary symptoms were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strain groups PVY C , PVY O and PVY Z elicit HR phenotypes with hypersensitivity genes Nc, Ny, or Nz, respectively. Strain groups PVY N and PVY E overcome all three hypersensitivity genes, but differ in the phenotypes they induce in tobacco, only PVY N eliciting veinal necrosis (Chikh-Ali et al 2014;Karasev and Gray 2013;Rowley et al 2015;Kehoe and Jones 2016;Jones and Vincent 2018). Such biological strains do not necessarily coincide with the phylogenetic lineages named after them.…”
Section: Spongosporamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Strain groups PVY C , PVY O and PVY Z elicit HR phenotypes with hypersensitivity genes Nc, Ny, or Nz, respectively. Strain groups PVY N and PVY E overcome all three hypersensitivity genes, but differ in the phenotypes they induce in tobacco, only PVY N eliciting veinal necrosis (Chikh-Ali et al 2014;Karasev and Gray 2013;Rowley et al 2015;Kehoe and Jones 2016;Jones and Vincent 2018). Such biological strains do not necessarily coincide with the phylogenetic lineages named after them.…”
Section: Spongosporamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, previously potato biological strain groups PVY C and PVY O were thought to coincide with major lineages PVY C and PVY O , respectively. However, this proved incorrect as isolates within biological strain group PVY D fitted within phylogroup PVY C and those in PVY Z within phylogroup PVY O (Kehoe and Jones 2016;Jones and Vincent 2018). As the number of complete PVY genome sequences from different world regions grows, phylogenetic nomenclature based on biological, geographical, and sequence names is becoming increasingly unsustainable so substituting Latinised numerals for current PVY subgroup names was suggested (Jones 2014;Kehoe and Jones 2016;Jones and Kehoe 2016).…”
Section: Spongosporamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PVY N and PVY E overcome Nc, Ny , and Nz (yet to be tested with putative Nd ), but are separated by the symptoms they cause in infected tobacco plants, only PVY N inducing veinal necrosis in this species (Jones 1990; Singh et al. 2008; Karasev and Gray 2013; Gray and Power 2018; Jones and Vincent 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nytbr and Nctbr genes from S. tuberosum limits virus movement within the plant by inducing systemic necrosis on virus infected tissues (Nie et al 2012: Jones andStuart 2018). This is a form of resistance which results in little or no virus translocation to the daughter tubers from the mother plant after initial infection (Bertschinger et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%