2010
DOI: 10.1080/17450918.2010.527437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Strange mutations”: Shakespeare, Austen and cultural success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They must multiply into a variety that supplements the original but that does not replace it". 46 Austentatious, however, offers us more than a reassuring affirmation that canonical material and cultural appropriations can coexist. It also heeds Simone Murray's call for adaptation studies to move away from a myopic focus on comparative aesthetic analysis, and toward a deconstruction of the artistic, commercial, and institutional power structures that shape modern adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They must multiply into a variety that supplements the original but that does not replace it". 46 Austentatious, however, offers us more than a reassuring affirmation that canonical material and cultural appropriations can coexist. It also heeds Simone Murray's call for adaptation studies to move away from a myopic focus on comparative aesthetic analysis, and toward a deconstruction of the artistic, commercial, and institutional power structures that shape modern adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%