Strategic Cyberbullying and the Reorganisation of Political Culture

Abstract

<jats:p>President of the United States Donald Trump engages in ongoing Twitter-attacks on (perceived) political opponents such as named politicians, celebrities, news channels and named journalists. In June 2015 the New York Times began to compile a list of Trump’s insults on Twitter. By January 2020 the list compiles the “598 People, Places and Things Donald Trump has insulted on Twitter”. In this article, we make use of this list as an archive of condensed affective expressions that allow us to analyse the ways in which Trump uses Twitter to mobilise politically in manners which we will term ‘strategic cyberbullying’. Cyberbullying is often discussed as a phenomenon that arises among children and young people, yet we suggest that borrowing an analytic lens from cyberbullying research allows us to better understand the dynamics of Trump’s use of Twitter for political mobilisation. Through a categorical mapping of the New York Times Archive, we show how political opponents are discredited strategically and a new kind of political territory is established through an intentional circulation of particular interfacial refrains through Twitter. These refrains travel between on- and offline contexts to extend the reach of the campaign through establishing a new form of we-ness that includes and excludes communities. We show how this we-ness in Trump’s affective politics is shaped (also) by the Twitter interface and holds the potential to alter the democratic public and the thresholds for democratic participation.</jats:p>

Affects, Interfaces, Events

“…Categorical mapping is inspired by Adele Clarke's methodology of mapping and her work on situational analysis (Clarke 2005). However, in this study the focus is not on situational maps but on laying out visually what is in the archive by categorizing the ways in which #MeToo is being addressed (Fritsch, Kofoed & Reestorff 2020). In this regard, categorical mapping approaches an archive (Rasmussen 2020) In this context positively and negatively framed FB-posts refer to updates and articles in which the journalist, the news media, or the opinion writer reveal an explicit opinion on #MeToo, or in which the post and the article are exclusively framed around a person that holds a positive or negative attitude towards #MeToo.…”

Cyberbullying on Social Media in Indonesia and Its Legal Impact: Analysis of Language Use in Ethnicity, Religious, Racial, and Primordial Issues

“…There have been some studies discussed about cyberbullying involving school students (Arrieta-López & Carrasquilla-Diaz, 2021; Campbell, 2005;Li, 2007), university students (Abaido, 2020;Rafferty & Vander Ven, 2014;Whittaker & Kowalski, 2015), adolescents (Bakar, 2015;Adiyanti et al, 2020;Shemesh & Heiman, 2021), and adults (Randall, 2001) using electronic devices such as cell phones (Sticca & Perren, 2012), through the internet (William & Guerra, 2007), or social media (Abaido, 2020). However, cyberbullying doesn't happen to individuals only such as ordinary people (Rahayu, 2012), politician (Fritsch et al, 2020;Ma'yuuf & Abbas, 2021), and celebrity (Indrayani & Johansari, 2019), but it can also be aimed at a country or a group of people.…”