Strategic Decision-Making and Social Skills: Integrating Behavioral Economics and Social Cognition Research

Abstract

Strategic decisions are affected by beliefs about the expectations of others and their possible decisions. Thus, strategic decisions are influenced by the social context and by beliefs about other actors' levels of sophistication. The present study investigated whether strategic decision-making, as measured by the beauty contest game, is associated with social skills, as measured by the Autism Quotient (AQ). In line with our hypothesis, we found that social skills were positively related to successful strategic decision-making. Furthermore, results showed a curvilinear relationship between steps of reasoning in the beauty contest game and social skills, indicating that very high as well as very low scoring individuals on the social skills subscale of the AQ engaged in high-levels of strategic thinking.

Does Death Anxiety Moderate the Adequacy of Retirement Savings? Empirical Evidence from 40-Plus Clients of Spanish Financial Advisory Firms

“…This decision provides a novel approach and adds value to the study, but we must also recognize that the target group is made up of people who may be assumed to be particularly aware of the importance of money matters, which may make it difficult to generalize findings to a broader population. Due to the fact that inclusion only of clients of financial advisory services entails a potential endogeneity bias, another further research avenue could include a non-financial advisory client group, in order to better tease the role of the financial counselor on clients' decisions, as well as others influences from the social context (Leder et al 2016).…”

Activating the different sides of top management team faultlines in enterprise sustainable development: Is environmental responsibility a burden or boost to small and medium‐sized enterprises in China?

“…Similarly, if a bankruptcy threat strikes, then TMTs with activated identity faultlines tend to make suboptimal decisions by using stereotypic cues and inconclusive evidence (de Dreu et al, 1999), reducing the frequency of information exchanged (Kelly & Karau, 1999;Kelly & Loving, 2004), monopolizing the attention of decision-makers, decreasing the opportunity to pool unshared information and impairing hidden profile performance (Bowman & Wittenbaum, 2012). Given the complexity and ambiguity faced by TMTs when making environmental responsibility decisions, a "scarcity mindset" may be detrimental (Leder et al, 2016).…”

Strategic Leadership, Commitment and Employee Motivation: what influences attitudes towards the workplace

“…In management, as well as in any other social context, decisions are not solely based on the decision maker's preference, but also on others' preferences and their resulting choices (Leder, Schilbach & Mojzisch, 2016). Thus, it is in the interest of management science as well as practitioners to understand how strategic decision making can be optimised.…”