2019
DOI: 10.47535/1991ojbe057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Decision-Making Supported by Traditional Financial Indicators

Abstract: Traditional financial indicators calculated from financial statements cannot provide adequate information for the management, do not support strategic decisions. The reason for this is the methodology used in producing financial statements and the operational logic of financial accounting. Financial accounting thinks in terms of business year that is 12 months. It deals with events of the past, more accurately, with so called economic activities. Financial accounting evaluates such economic activities in terms… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is achieved by the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) indicator system. (Musinszki -Süveges, 2019) The BSC is a balanced strategic evaluation system based on performance indicators.…”
Section: Balanced Scorecardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is achieved by the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) indicator system. (Musinszki -Süveges, 2019) The BSC is a balanced strategic evaluation system based on performance indicators.…”
Section: Balanced Scorecardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khanna and Palepu believe that the basis of financial strategy is "rational utilization" and "scarcity", which can ensure the stable operation of enterprise resource structure, solvency and capital flow [3]. Musinszki and Suveges believe that Financial analysis should combine financial indicators with strategic decisionmaking to strengthen the strategic management of enterprises [4]. Jarunee Wonglimpiyarat believes that Traditional financial models cannot fully understand the strategic positioning of enterprises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%