2021
DOI: 10.1038/s43247-021-00326-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Forest Reserves can protect biodiversity in the western United States and mitigate climate change

Abstract: Forest preservation is crucial for protecting biodiversity and mitigating climate change. Here we assess current forest preservation in the western United States using spatial data and find that beyond the 18.9% (17.5 Mha) currently protected, an additional 11.1% (10.3 Mha) is needed to achieve 30% preservation by 2030 (30 × 30). To help meet this regional preservation target, we developed a framework that prioritizes forestlands for preservation using spatial metrics of biodiversity and/or carbon within each … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Forestation can regulate the impacts of climate change and human activity through the carbon sink [89][90][91]. According to land-use change, the forestlands in LHRB have increased from 11,477.4 km 2 to 11,815.7 km 2 during the past 20 years, which illustrates the local government's efforts.…”
Section: Response Of Eq To Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forestation can regulate the impacts of climate change and human activity through the carbon sink [89][90][91]. According to land-use change, the forestlands in LHRB have increased from 11,477.4 km 2 to 11,815.7 km 2 during the past 20 years, which illustrates the local government's efforts.…”
Section: Response Of Eq To Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, MOG that have experienced severe natural disturbance are logged, including within administrative reserves (such as late-successional reserves under the Northwest Forest Plan in the Pacific Northwest) and even within IRAs. However, we recommend protections extend through post-disturbance successional stages to allow forests to recover carbon stocks (proforestation, Moomaw et al, 2019) and because most carbon in severe disturbances simply transfers from live to dead pools and soils (Law et al, 2021).…”
Section: Conservation Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary and old-growth forests generally have received increased attention internationally as natural climate solutions (DellaSala et al, 2020;IUCN, 2020;Law et al, 2021Law et al, ), 10.3389/ffgc.2022 including from policy makers 1 (e.g., March 22, 2022) and conservation non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in the United States 2 ; 3 (accessed May 15, 2022). Article 5.1 of the Paris Climate Agreement calls on governments to protect and enhance "carbon sinks and reservoirs, " while Article 21 of the UNFCCC COP26 Glasgow Climate Pact emphasizes "the importance of protecting, conserving and restoring nature and ecosystems, including forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the spatial correlation between carbon storage and species richness can be limited at scales relevant to conservation planning (Di Marco et al, 2018), and protecting some imperiled species may be incompatible with maximizing carbon storage (Littlefield & D'Amato, 2022). These trade‐offs may lead to poor allocation of resources in some contexts if prioritizing carbon storage is presumed to universally maximize biodiversity benefit (Beaudrot et al, 2016; Phelps et al, 2012; Seddon et al, 2020), though in other contexts (e.g., where there is strong concordance between biodiversity and carbon), “win–wins” may be achievable (Brandt et al, 2014; Law et al, 2021; Lecina‐Diaz et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%