1993
DOI: 10.1016/0024-6301(93)90284-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic group decision support systems—A guide for the unwary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DSS concept has been extended to accommodate the needs of groups of decision-makers in the form of group DSSs (GDSSs) (DeSanctis and Gallupe, 1987). GDSSs have been designed to improve meeting effi ciency, effectiveness and team productivity (Alavi, 1991;Finlay and Marples, 1992;Aiken et al, 1994). The systems have been used for a variety of decision-making tasks, such as idea generation and evaluation, setting goals and objectives, evaluation of alternatives and identify-ing assumptions (Jessup and Kukalis, 1990;Mockler and Dologite, 1991;Aiken et al, 1994).…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of Relevant Decision Support Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DSS concept has been extended to accommodate the needs of groups of decision-makers in the form of group DSSs (GDSSs) (DeSanctis and Gallupe, 1987). GDSSs have been designed to improve meeting effi ciency, effectiveness and team productivity (Alavi, 1991;Finlay and Marples, 1992;Aiken et al, 1994). The systems have been used for a variety of decision-making tasks, such as idea generation and evaluation, setting goals and objectives, evaluation of alternatives and identify-ing assumptions (Jessup and Kukalis, 1990;Mockler and Dologite, 1991;Aiken et al, 1994).…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of Relevant Decision Support Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of different forms of group decision support systems (GDSSs) has been provided by Finlay and Marples (1992) who state that "the aim of a GDSS is to reduce the 'process losses' associated with conventional group decision making, namely disorganised and unfocused activity, dominance by one or two members of the group and the consequent inhibition of others, and the social pressures to conform". In order to provide an organising framework for research to evaluate the effects of interventions of various communication technologies, DeSanctis and Gallupe (1987) proposed a multi-dimensional taxonomy of systems involving situational factors, particularly group size, member proximity and task type.…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of these systems are to improve the effectiveness of the group process and reduce negative effects of groups, including the pressure to conform, free riding of members, and domination of the group by one or more members (Nunamaker et al, 1991). Many GSS will share common characteristics (Finlay & Marples, 1992), including enhanced communication facilities between group participants, enhanced modelling and interface facilities to permit voting and ranking, and the availability of both qualitative and quantitative decision support tools, with which members are comfortable, which are transparent in operation, and which are flexible. Such systems may be designed to embrace features of group-based processes, including processes of information sharing, storage and retrieval, and also of learning (Wilson et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%