1998
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.44.8.1021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Growth Options

Abstract: We provide a strategic rationale for growth options under uncertainty and imperfect competition. In a market with strategic competition, investment confers a greater capability to take advantage of future growth opportunities. This strategic advantage leads to the capture of a greater share of the market, either by dissuading entry or by inducing competitors to "make room" for the stronger competitor. As a result of this strategic effect, payoffs are in a rough sense more convex than in the case of no investme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
290
0
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 479 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
8
290
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A structural approach is explicit regarding the nature of future competition. Kulatilaka and Perotti (1998) follow this approach by evaluating the decision to launch a new technology in the context of different conjectures about market structure. This solution marries the industry structure analysis to core competence, but through the stipulation that the analysis is forward-looking rather than focused on current market structure.…”
Section: Discussion: How Good a Heuristic?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A structural approach is explicit regarding the nature of future competition. Kulatilaka and Perotti (1998) follow this approach by evaluating the decision to launch a new technology in the context of different conjectures about market structure. This solution marries the industry structure analysis to core competence, but through the stipulation that the analysis is forward-looking rather than focused on current market structure.…”
Section: Discussion: How Good a Heuristic?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies, including [19], [3], [10], [12], [9], [8], and [20], consider symmetric firms in order to examine the preemptive behavior of competition. In these models, if the value of the optimal entry of the leader is greater than the value of the entry for the best reply of the follower, then both firms want to become a leader.…”
Section: Value Functions Of the Benchmark Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical model incorporating the real option into game theory is sometimes referred to as an investment game, in which two firms decide the exercise timings of their investment options in a duopolistic market. Previous studies, such as [19], [3], [12], [9], and [20], investigated competition by symmetric firms. An important implication about the previous studies is that an advantage of the first mover and a negative externality of the rival's investment reduce the value for the option of the firms and accelerate the timing of the investment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finalmente, en el de las opciones reales, el objetivo metodológico no es tanto aislar el flujo de caja del intangible sino introducir en él el impacto secuencial de la capacidad de decisión por parte del equipo directivo (abandonar, retrasar, o disminuir son algunas de las posibles decisiones) ante expectativas cambiantes de un entorno sujeto a grandes dosis de incertidumbre (Myers, 1977;Kulatilaka, 1998), por ello podría combinarse con cualquiera de los métodos de ingresos expuestos. La AICPA (2011) lo recomienda para la valoración de patentes o gastos de investigación y desarrollo, dado que se cuentan con una protección legal que otorga a la empresa gran capacidad de decisión (Schwartz, 2001;Rubio y Lamothe 2010).…”
Section: Los Modelos Financieros Frente Al Marco Teóricounclassified