2005
DOI: 10.1002/smj.469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic leadership and executive innovation influence: an international multi‐cluster comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
288
1
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 402 publications
(302 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
7
288
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to network size, our findings echo the notion that managing complex social problems is reached through a collective effort, namely a strategic leadership vision centered on the formation of numerous intra-and inter-group alliances (Furrer et al, 2012;Helfat & Martin, 2015;Nutt & Backoff, 1993;Raisch & Birkinshaw, 2008;Zaccaro & Klimoski, 2001). In essence, an increase in network size enhances one's ability to receive and transmit information within a given system, hence facilitating the implementation of actions that will result in a lasting impact (Albers et al, 2013;Cullen et al, 2015;Elenkov et al, 2005;Fuentelsaz et al, 2013). Our analysis of JRH discourse revealed his interest in networking with influential regulators in both local and global spheres of influence (e.g., "street vendors and kings").…”
Section: Social Networkingmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With respect to network size, our findings echo the notion that managing complex social problems is reached through a collective effort, namely a strategic leadership vision centered on the formation of numerous intra-and inter-group alliances (Furrer et al, 2012;Helfat & Martin, 2015;Nutt & Backoff, 1993;Raisch & Birkinshaw, 2008;Zaccaro & Klimoski, 2001). In essence, an increase in network size enhances one's ability to receive and transmit information within a given system, hence facilitating the implementation of actions that will result in a lasting impact (Albers et al, 2013;Cullen et al, 2015;Elenkov et al, 2005;Fuentelsaz et al, 2013). Our analysis of JRH discourse revealed his interest in networking with influential regulators in both local and global spheres of influence (e.g., "street vendors and kings").…”
Section: Social Networkingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Such behaviours are aimed at (a) creating high-value networking opportunities that allow for organizational growth, and (b) managing "inside-out"/exploration and "outside-in"/exploitation paradoxes in order to prevent conflict and promote positive change (see Lewis, Andriopoulos, & Smith, 2013). In this context, scholars have explored strategic leadership by combining myriad theoretical stances and, most noticeably, social network concepts and the exploration-exploitation paradox (see Albers, Wohlgezogen, & Zajac, 2013;Ariño & Ring, 2010;Elenkov, Judge, & Wright, 2005;Jansen, Vera, & Crossan, 2009;O'Reilly & Tushman, 2011;Smith & Tushman, 2005;Sosik et al, 2005;Vera & Crossan, 2004). The current understanding is that strategic leadership is a systemic process that should be studied through multiple theoretical lenses (Lin & Darnall, 2015;Meng, 2012).…”
Section: Strategic Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diversity in terms of board tenure can imply a broad set of perspectives on the opportunities and threats in the market and ideas and strategies an organization can use (Sawyer, Houlette, & Yeagley, 2006). Diversity in tenure is related to diversity in cognitive frameworks which can improve the quality of discussion (Awino, 2013;Elenkov, Judge, & Wright, 2005). While older tenured members can provide a solid understanding of the organization, newer members are able to provide different perspectives on the organization's future direction.…”
Section: Diversity Of Tenure On the Boardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researches on innovation have focused either on the factors that trigger or hinder technological innovation (product and process innovation) within companies, or on the factors that influence technological innovation outcome (e.g., Levinthal, 1989, 1990;Elenkov et al, 2005;Hoffman and Hegarty, 1993;Keizer et al, 2002;Yam et al, 2004). Most of them investigated technological innovations related with products or manufacturing processes of companies, by focusing on the effect of its activities on innovation performance (e.g., Romero and Martínez-Román, 2012) or the type of innovation -radical or incremental -that is influenced by the relevant factors (Laursen and Salter, 2006).…”
Section: ⅰ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%