Strategic principles for smart city development: A multiple case study analysis of European best practices

Abstract

Recent studies reveal a deep-rooted division in research on smart cities, which surfaces as a set of dichotomies that question whether smart city development should be based on a: (1) technology-led or holistic strategy; (2) double or quadruple-helix model of collaboration; (3) top-down or bottom-up approach; (4) mono-dimensional or integrated intervention logic. These dichotomies generate a critical knowledge gap because they suggest divergent hypotheses on what principles need to be considered when implementing strategies for enabling smart city development. This paper starts filling such a gap by reporting on the findings of a multiple case study analysis which is conducted into European best practices. In meeting this aim, four European cities considered to be leaders in the field of smart city development are analyzed to test the validity of the hypotheses emerging from each dichotomy. These cities are Amsterdam, Barcelona, Helsinki and Vienna. The results of this best practice analysis offer a series of critical insights into what strategic principles drive smart city development in Europe and generate scientific knowledge which helps to overcome the dichotomous nature of smart city research.

Smart technologies for fighting pandemics: The techno- and human- driven approaches in controlling the virus transmission

“…Especially, IoT driven services in Barcelona smart city have claimed to improve quality of life for its citizens (Kamel Boulos and Al-Shorbaji 2014). Care et al (2018) (Mora et al 2019b). Given the level of smart technologies adopted, smart cities are claimed to offer best living conditions and are equated with healthy cities (Kamel Boulos et al 2013).…”

Using urban foresight techniques in city visioning: Lessons from the Reading 2050 vision

“…The fourth element of the helix is, however, far from being well-established in innovation research, and there is often disagreement over its precise constitution: for example, the extent to which it includes innovation 'users' as well as civil society (Hogland and Linton, 2017). Nonetheless, recent work has highlighted the usefulness of the QH as a way of conceptualising the participatory approach to vision development in smart cities (Mora et al, 2018;van Waart et al, 2015). For example, van Waart et al 2015see vision development as a collaborative process which helps shape the 'participatory domain' (Figure 1).…”

Smart City Maturity Level Analysis Using ITIL Framework

“…The results of this research also show that respondents feel that the Smart City Application can do everything I expect them to do such as providing information on ambulance information, cleaning services and transportation of home waste, floods, traffic jams and traffic directions [10,11], seen in Figure 4. The results of this study indicate that respondents feel this Smart City Application is very easy to use, generosity operates without experiencing many difficulties [12] seen in Figure 5. The results of this study also show that respondents can use it without written instructions due to the easy interface display according to user needs [13], as seen in Figure 6.…”