“…These articles mainly map differences without any attempt to explain them. Examples of such articles are those that analysed how universities in the USA comply with gender-based violence and anti-stalking regulations, which demand that specific prevention information should be prominently displayed on homepages (Dunlap et al, 2018a ; Lund & Thomas, 2015 ; Truman & Mustaine, 2009 ). In a similar way, articles evaluate policies with regard to website accessibility for people with disabilities (Erickson et al, 2013 ; Jackson & Jones, 2014 ; Solovieva & Bock, 2014 ), institutional policies regarding non-medical use of prescription stimulants in U.S. higher education (Aikins et al, 2017 ), work–life balance and flexible work policies at universities (Tower & Dilks, 2015 ), advice provision for students with mental problems by Australian universities (Laws & Fiedler, 2013 ), and presence of dialogic features at university websites (McAllister, 2012a , 2012b ; Shadinger, 2013 ).…”