2010
DOI: 10.1080/17501220802385866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategy clusters and sources of knowledge in French L2 listening comprehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cases, students began the exercise by "focusing their attention" to the task or "elevating their level of concentration". To highlight the relevance of this strategy, it can be pointed out that at the commencement of casual conversation between friends or family members this increased level of concentration often would not be present; whereas, when listeners are aware that they are listening for a specific purpose or goal they will tend to use more selective attention (Graham et al, 2010). The reason a greater attention was present at the beginning can be explained by the fact that the subjects likely anticipated that because it was a listening comprehension study, they would likely face certain challenges.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In all cases, students began the exercise by "focusing their attention" to the task or "elevating their level of concentration". To highlight the relevance of this strategy, it can be pointed out that at the commencement of casual conversation between friends or family members this increased level of concentration often would not be present; whereas, when listeners are aware that they are listening for a specific purpose or goal they will tend to use more selective attention (Graham et al, 2010). The reason a greater attention was present at the beginning can be explained by the fact that the subjects likely anticipated that because it was a listening comprehension study, they would likely face certain challenges.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, failure to recognize audio linguistic clues and cultural scripts seem to be the two areas that lead to comprehension failure. Many language teachers across the world have not yet had training in listening instruction pedagogy and this may be due to the lack of clear direction within the field (Graham et al, 2010). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower and higher level cognitive processes are not mutually exclusive and operate in an interactive manner (Graham & Macaro, 2008;Lynch, 2006). Despite the recognition of the importance of the interaction of lower and higher order processes in successful L2 listening comprehension, the current emphasis in published research in L2 listening pedagogy has been on higher level, particularly metacognitive, strategies (Graham, Santos, & Vanderplank, 2008;Graham, Santos, & Vanderplank, 2010;Vandergrift, 2002Vandergrift, , 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The employment of listening strategies has been shown to be associated with improvements in listening comprehension (Graham & Macaro, 2008). However, strategies which emphasise explicit knowledge and conscious control over listening processes must be used in conjunction with lower level L2 listening skills such as word recognition (Graham et al, 2010). L2 listeners who are unable to accurately recognise linguistic data may become overly dependent on compensatory strategies such as guessing from context, leading to listening comprehension errors (Field, 2008a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation