1991
DOI: 10.2307/747732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategy Use by Good and Poor Comprehenders Reading Expository Text of Differing Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
56
0
19

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
56
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Baker & Brown, 1984;Ehrlich, 1991;Forrest-Pressley & Waller, 1984;Garner, 1987). Both verbalizeable metacognitive knowledge and comprehension monitoring become more efficient with age, and within a grade level, skilled and less-skilled readers differ on reading-related metacognitive skills (Baker, 1984;Garner & Kraus, 1982;Kletzien, 1991;Paris & Myers, 1981;Zabrucky & Moore, 1989). Results of metacognitive training studies have not been very consistent, however, with a number of studies not showing significant transfer effects (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Baker & Brown, 1984;Ehrlich, 1991;Forrest-Pressley & Waller, 1984;Garner, 1987). Both verbalizeable metacognitive knowledge and comprehension monitoring become more efficient with age, and within a grade level, skilled and less-skilled readers differ on reading-related metacognitive skills (Baker, 1984;Garner & Kraus, 1982;Kletzien, 1991;Paris & Myers, 1981;Zabrucky & Moore, 1989). Results of metacognitive training studies have not been very consistent, however, with a number of studies not showing significant transfer effects (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Readers' language proficiency is related to the use of their reading strategies (Hong-Nam & Leavell, 2006;Shen, 2003;Wharton, 2000;Yang, 2002). Based on these researches, readers who have high proficiency try to use global strategies for understanding a text (Kletzien, 1991;Zhang & Wu, 2009). Readers who have low proficiency, try to utilize particular techniques that are not beneficial to understand a text (Gan, Humphreys, & Hamp-Lyons, 2004;Zhang & Wu, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As primeiras podem ser caracterizadas como comportamentos e pensamentos que interferem na aquisição da informação lida, ou ainda, como formas deliberadas de decodificação dos símbolos acerca da linguagem, constituindo a construção de significado (Kletzien, 1991;Kopke, 1997). Já as metacognitivas são definidas como a consciência que o leitor apresenta sobre o próprio nível de compreensão durante a leitura e a habilidade para controlar as ações cognitivas por meio de estratégias que facilitem a compreensão de um determinado tipo de texto ou de tarefa determinada (Bolívar, 2002).…”
Section: Estratégias De Leituraunclassified