2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1910.14602
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratified noncommutative geometry

Abstract: We prove a reconstruction theorem for stratifications of noncommutative stacks (i.e. presentable stable ∞-categories). In particular, we obtain a reconstruction theorem for quasicoherent sheaves over an ordinary stratified scheme. We show that our reconstruction theorem is compatible with symmetric monoidal structures, and with more general operadic structures such as En-monoidal structures.Our main application is to equivariant stable homotopy theory: for any compact Lie group G, we give a symmetric monoidal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While cyclotomic spectra were originally defined in terms of genuine T-spectra, we note that they can also be defined using the formalism of stratified categories [AMGR20,AMGR17c].…”
Section: The Secondary Cyclotomic Tracementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While cyclotomic spectra were originally defined in terms of genuine T-spectra, we note that they can also be defined using the formalism of stratified categories [AMGR20,AMGR17c].…”
Section: The Secondary Cyclotomic Tracementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification (c) is direct from the definition of relative functor ∞-categories. Furthermore, there is a definitional identification of the right-lax coinvariants B(N op ⋉ M op ) ≃ (BM op ) / r.lax N over BN op (see Appendix A of [AMGR3]), which determines the identification (d). The identification (e) follows from the codification of the N op -action on Fun(BM op , X) in the statement of the proposition.…”
Section: Disk Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification (e) follows from the codification of the N op -action on Fun(BM op , X) in the statement of the proposition. The identification (g) is the definition of left-lax invariants (see Appendix A of [AMGR3]).…”
Section: Disk Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we are restricting ourselves to the 1-dimensional case in this paper there is only one step to the assembly process, often described in terms of recollements. Discussions of this type can be found in [1,9,25], and we plan to return to the higher dimensional case elsewhere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%