2007
DOI: 10.3285/eg.56.1-2.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratigraphische Begriffe für das Quartär des norddeutschen Vereisungsgebietes

Abstract: Abstract. Norddeutschland und angrenzende Gebiete, beeinflusst durch die skandinavischen Inlandvereisungen, sind klassische Regionen der Quartärgeologie und -stratigraphie. Der Schweizer Geologe VON MORLOT (1844) vermutete bereits, dass die nordischen Vergletscherungen das Erzgebirge in Sachsen erreicht haben könnten. Die Entdeckung der Gletscherschrammen auf triassischem Muschelkalk in Rüdersdorf bei Berlin durch TORRELL (1875) führte zur generellen Akzeptanz der Glazialtheorie in Deutschland. PENCK (1879) v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
146
0
13

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
146
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…While some studies favour a correlation with Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 11 (*430 ka; e.g., Beaulieu et al 2001), dating of peat from the type region in northern Germany by U/Th methodology indicates a correlation with MIS 9 (*330 ka; Geyh and Müller 2005). This correlation is also favoured by the German Commission for Quaternary Stratigraphy (Litt et al 2007). Following this chronological correlation of the Holsteinian, the likely age of erosion at the base of the Thalgut sequence is attributed to a glaciation that occurred during MIS 10 (*350 ka).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While some studies favour a correlation with Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 11 (*430 ka; e.g., Beaulieu et al 2001), dating of peat from the type region in northern Germany by U/Th methodology indicates a correlation with MIS 9 (*330 ka; Geyh and Müller 2005). This correlation is also favoured by the German Commission for Quaternary Stratigraphy (Litt et al 2007). Following this chronological correlation of the Holsteinian, the likely age of erosion at the base of the Thalgut sequence is attributed to a glaciation that occurred during MIS 10 (*350 ka).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…While for many areas in other mountain ranges substantial glaciations are usually expected for this period, which is considered to represent the Rissian/Saalian glaciation (cf. Litt et al 2007;Habbe et al 2007), Schlüchter (1988a) concluded on the basis of the Thalgut and Meikirch sites that Swiss glaciers did not reach beyond the margin of the Alps during MIS 6. To solve this controversy, more drill holes will be necessary to evaluate potential periods of glacial overdeepening, to document the processes and timing of sedimentation and to investigate synchronicities in various glacial valleys along the alpine foreland.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Elsterian glaciation is correlated either with MIS 12 (Gibbard and Cohen, 2008;Ehlers et al, 2011) or MIS 10 (Litt et al, 2007Lee et al, 2012). However, new studies indicate two separate ice advances into northern Germany during MIS 12 and MIS 10 (Roskosch et al, 2015), which is also supported by the occurrence of two separate tills (Eissmann, 2002;Litt et al, 2007). At Sch€ oningen, deposits of the Elsterian glaciation and the subsequent interglacial were deposited and preserved in a tunnel valley (Lang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The remnant tunnel valley was completely filled by glacilacustrine deposits and overlain by subglacial till during the Drenthe ice advance of the Saalian glaciation. The ice advances of the Saalian glaciation in northern Germany are generally correlated with MIS 6 (Litt et al, 2007;Ehlers et al, 2011). However, there is growing evidence of an earlier ice advance during MIS 8 (Beets et al, 2005;Kars et al, 2012;Roskosch et al, 2015).…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The origins of the use and control of fire is one of the central and most debated topics in Paleolithic archaeology and human evolution (e.g., Goudsblom, 1986;James et al, 1989;de Lumley, 2006;Gowlett, 2006;Wrangham, 2009;Alperson-Afil and Goren-Inbar, 2010;Roebroeks and Villa, 2011a;Sandgathe et al, 2011a;Gowlett and Wrangham, 2013). Fire use and control would have provided several crucial advantages to early humans: it can serve as a light and heating source (Oakley, 1955;Bellomo, 1994;Gilligan, 2010), as a hunting aid (Goudsblom, 1986;Mallol et al, 2007), can be used for cleaning occupation surfaces (Goldberg et al, 2009;Wadley et al, 2011), as protection from predators (Goudsblom, 1986;Brain, 1991), as a means to improve tool technology (Ahlers, 1983;Mallol et al, 2007;Brown et al, 2009), and as a way to increase food range, its nutritional value, and preservation (Stahl et al, 1984;Bellomo, 1994;Wrangham et al, 1999;Wrangham and Conklin-Brittain, 2003;Mallol et al, 2007;Wrangham, 2009; for an overview, see Clark and Harris, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%