1985
DOI: 10.5575/geosoc.91.815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratigraphy and sedimentary facies of the Tertiary Shimizu and Misaki Formations in the southwestern part of Shikoku

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the R max value of 0.7–1.9% in the Early Miocene Misaki group overlying the Shimizu Formation ( Kimura 1985) is lower than that of the other formations around the granitic body, this has a higher temperature than that of the shelf basin sediment.…”
Section: Thermal Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the R max value of 0.7–1.9% in the Early Miocene Misaki group overlying the Shimizu Formation ( Kimura 1985) is lower than that of the other formations around the granitic body, this has a higher temperature than that of the shelf basin sediment.…”
Section: Thermal Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…1). These complexes are underlain unconformably by the shelf and forearc facies of the Cretaceous Monobegawa Group, Torinosu group, Doganaro formation, Uwagumi formation, Uwajima Group and Miocene Misaki Group ( Kimura 1985; Okamura 1992; Morino 1993).…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best evidence for regional uplift prior to the Middle Miocene, as summarized by Sakai (1988) and Hibbard and Karig (1990b), comes from the unconformities that separate the Shimanto Belt from overlying fore-arc-basin successions, such as the Kumano Group (Kii Peninsula), the Shijujiyama Formation (Muroto Peninsula) and the Misaki Group (Hata Peninsula). We believe, however, that these contacts are submarine unconformities, particularly because the fore-arc and slope-basin successions grade up-section from basal units that were deposited at middle bathyal depths into shallow-water facies (Kimura 1985;Chijiwa 1988;Hisatomi 1988;Osozawa 1988). Submarine uplift of the Eocene-Oligocene accretionary prism almost certainly did occur, perhaps in response to underplating of the Oligocene-Miocene sediments (Fig.…”
Section: Thermal Overprint Of Palaeogene Cleavage?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The best evidence for an early phase of uplift is the unconformity that separates the basal Misaki Group (~18 Ma) from the underlying Shimanto Belt (Kimura, 1985;Sakai, 1988). This contact probably is a submarine unconformity, however, separating the accretionary prism from overlying slope-basin deposits (similar to the basal Shijujiyama deposits of Muroto).…”
Section: Coeval Rocks In Southwest Japanmentioning
confidence: 99%