1975
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032<1457:samitw>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratospheric Aerosol Measurements II: The Worldwide Distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size distribution is chosen to be consistent with the concentrations of particles with diameters greater than 0.3 and 0.5am Rosen and Hofmann, 1975) and the concentration of condensation nuclei, i.e., radius smaller than 0.1um, (Rosen et al, 1974;Kaselau et al, 1974). The ratio of concentrations for the two sizes (greater than 0.3 and 0.5µm diameters) gives a characteristic (e-folding) diameter of about 0.15pm for an exponential size distribution .…”
Section: Radiative Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size distribution is chosen to be consistent with the concentrations of particles with diameters greater than 0.3 and 0.5am Rosen and Hofmann, 1975) and the concentration of condensation nuclei, i.e., radius smaller than 0.1um, (Rosen et al, 1974;Kaselau et al, 1974). The ratio of concentrations for the two sizes (greater than 0.3 and 0.5µm diameters) gives a characteristic (e-folding) diameter of about 0.15pm for an exponential size distribution .…”
Section: Radiative Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ measurements of aerosol density in the stratosphere have often been made for large particles with balloon-borne aerosol counters (e.g., RosEN et al, 1975), in which the method used is the counting of light pulses scattered by individual aerosols in the subject atmosphere. The principle using a visible light source applies to aerosols with diameters larger than 0.3um.…”
Section: Correspondence To the Aerosol Counter Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lidar measurements (e.g., using EARLINET; Amodeo et al, 2007), airborne experiments (e.g., Zieger et al, 2007), or balloon ascents (e.g., Rosen et al, 1975) can be used to derive aerosol vertical profiles on local scales, while the backscatter lidar CALIOP on board the satellite CALIPSO (Winker et al, 2009) is currently the only instrument that provides information on a global scale. A limitation of CALIPSO measurements is their sparse spacial and temporal resolution (Winker et al, 2010;Amiridis et al, 2013), which could be improved drastically by deriving aerosol height directly from passive imaging instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%