Data Assimilation for Atmospheric, Oceanic and Hydrologic Applications (Vol. III) 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43415-5_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratospheric and Mesospheric Data Assimilation: The Role of Middle Atmospheric Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Primary tropopause altitude trends over Antarctica were found to vary considerably among the reanalyses, with increasing trends in ERA-Interim and MERRA-2 and decreasing trends in JRA-55 and CFSR. These conflicting trends over Antarctica may be a result of different ozone input sources and assimilation as well as the dynamical responses to ozone concentration changes (e.g., Martineau et al, 2016;Polavarapu and Pulido, 2017;Fujiwara et al, 2017). For example, ERA-Interim and MERRA-2 assimilate ozone retrievals (both profiles and total column ozone, TCO) from SBUV and SBUV/2, as well as TCO from OMI and profiles from Aura MLS, while JRA-55 only assimilates TCO and CFSR assimilates TCO and relatively coarsevertical-resolution profiles from SBUV and SBUV/2.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary tropopause altitude trends over Antarctica were found to vary considerably among the reanalyses, with increasing trends in ERA-Interim and MERRA-2 and decreasing trends in JRA-55 and CFSR. These conflicting trends over Antarctica may be a result of different ozone input sources and assimilation as well as the dynamical responses to ozone concentration changes (e.g., Martineau et al, 2016;Polavarapu and Pulido, 2017;Fujiwara et al, 2017). For example, ERA-Interim and MERRA-2 assimilate ozone retrievals (both profiles and total column ozone, TCO) from SBUV and SBUV/2, as well as TCO from OMI and profiles from Aura MLS, while JRA-55 only assimilates TCO and CFSR assimilates TCO and relatively coarsevertical-resolution profiles from SBUV and SBUV/2.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forecast error difference peaks at a later time in the SH (120 h in contrast to 102 h for the NH). This might be related to the time spent for the impact of stratospheric temperature gradient correction to reach the mid‐tropospheric geopotential; in turn a chain reaction is involved, composed of the stratospheric polar vortex, upper‐tropospheric jet stream, and tropospheric baroclinic eddies (Polavarapu and Pulido, ; Tripathi et al ., ). This hypothesis needs to be verified in the future.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internally generated planetary waves are expected to propagate up to the upper mesosphere and lower thermosphere [Garcia et al, 2005;Chandran et al, 2013;Sassi and Liu, 2014]; however, the MERRA reanalysis is available up to 0.1 hPa (while GEOS-5 model reaches 0.01 hPa). We also note that the highest levels of MERRA reanalysis are less constrained from observations (channel 14 of the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU) peaks at 1 hPa [Polavarapu and Pulido, 2017]). However, these heights are partially constrained by observational information propagating upward in the assimilation system.…”
Section: 1002/2017jd026597mentioning
confidence: 94%