2013
DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-3307-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratospheric BrO abundance measured by a balloon-borne submillimeterwave radiometer

Abstract: Measurements of mixing ratio profiles of stratospheric bromine monoxide (BrO) were made using observations of BrO rotational line emission at 650.179 GHz by a balloon-borne SIS (superconductor-insulator-superconductor) submillimeterwave heterodyne limb sounder (SLS). The balloon was launched from Ft. Sumner, New Mexico (34° N) on 22 September 2011. Peak mid-day BrO abundance varied from 16 ± 2 ppt at 34 km to 6 ± 4 ppt at 16 km. Corresponding estimates of total inorganic bromine (Bry), derived f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In WMO 2014, the best estimate for SGI VSLS is 0.7 to 3.4 ppt based on observations of brominated VSLS at the tropical tropopause, and the best estimate for PGI is 1.1 to 4.3 ppt based on modeling studies (Table 1-9 of Carpenter et al, 2014). In addition to observed SGI VSLS and modeled PGI, estimates of Br y VSLS in WMO 2014 have been based on analysis of BrO profiles in the middle to upper stratosphere obtained by either ground-based (e.g., Schofield et al, 2004;Theys et al, 2007), balloon-borne (e.g., Dorf et al, 2008;Stachnik et al, 2013), or satellite instruments (e.g., Dorf et al, 2006;Kovalenko et al, 2007;McLinden et al, 2010;Parrella et al, 2013;Sioris et al, 2006). The mean value of the best estimate for Br y VSLS from these studies is 6 ppt, with a range of 3 to 8 ppt (Carpenter et al, 2014).…”
Section: Stratospheric Bromine From Vsls (Br Y Vsls )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In WMO 2014, the best estimate for SGI VSLS is 0.7 to 3.4 ppt based on observations of brominated VSLS at the tropical tropopause, and the best estimate for PGI is 1.1 to 4.3 ppt based on modeling studies (Table 1-9 of Carpenter et al, 2014). In addition to observed SGI VSLS and modeled PGI, estimates of Br y VSLS in WMO 2014 have been based on analysis of BrO profiles in the middle to upper stratosphere obtained by either ground-based (e.g., Schofield et al, 2004;Theys et al, 2007), balloon-borne (e.g., Dorf et al, 2008;Stachnik et al, 2013), or satellite instruments (e.g., Dorf et al, 2006;Kovalenko et al, 2007;McLinden et al, 2010;Parrella et al, 2013;Sioris et al, 2006). The mean value of the best estimate for Br y VSLS from these studies is 6 ppt, with a range of 3 to 8 ppt (Carpenter et al, 2014).…”
Section: Stratospheric Bromine From Vsls (Br Y Vsls )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being short lived, there are large uncertainties in using atmospheric concentration measurements to estimate their global fluxes and their net contribution to the stratospheric bromine (Warwick et al, 2006;Liang et al, 2010;Pyle et al, 2011;Ordóñez et al, 2012;Ziska et al, 2013;Hossaini et al, 2013). A large range of contributions to stratospheric inorganic bromine of 110 ppt can be found in the literature (Dorf et al, 2008;Salawich et al, 2010;Schofield et al, 2011;Aschmann et al, 2011;Tegtmeier et al, 2012;Stachnik et al, 2013;Hossaini et al, 2012a). The UNEP/WMO ozone assessment of 2011 reports the value as 6(3-8) ppt (Montzka, Reimann et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…CHBr 3 and CH 2 Br 2 are the dominant contributors to bromine VSLS species. Although their tropospheric lifetime is relatively short (a few weeks for CHBr 3 and several months for CH 2 Br 2 ), they can be lifted effectively through deep convective systems and transported into the upper troposphere and/or lower stratosphere (UTLS) to make a significant contribution to the total ambient bromine (Sturges et al, 2000;Yang et al, 2005;Salawitch, 2006). Being short lived, there are large uncertainties in using atmospheric concentration measurements to estimate their global fluxes and their net contribution to the stratospheric bromine (Warwick et al, 2006;Liang et al, 2010;Pyle et al, 2011;Ordóñez et al, 2012;Ziska et al, 2013;Hossaini et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%