2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.05.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Straylight Effects with Aging and Lens Extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
242
2
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
12
242
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…By applying Equation 1, we obtain Leq=0.029s. With values of log(s) ranging from 0.8 to 1.8 and higher among the European driver population, 54 this yields Leq = 0.19 to 1.9 cd/m 2 . That is, eyes with straylight values that fall in the lower part of the interval do not suffer a large effect on their state of adaptation.…”
Section: Translation Of Straylight Into Practical Glare Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By applying Equation 1, we obtain Leq=0.029s. With values of log(s) ranging from 0.8 to 1.8 and higher among the European driver population, 54 this yields Leq = 0.19 to 1.9 cd/m 2 . That is, eyes with straylight values that fall in the lower part of the interval do not suffer a large effect on their state of adaptation.…”
Section: Translation Of Straylight Into Practical Glare Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors measuring straylight in cataract eyes with the C-Quant device similarly have observed either no or minimal relationship between the log(s) values and high contrast acuity [22,51,52,80]. Some authors have noted a relationship between log(s) straylight and chart contrast sensitivity testing [22], while others have not [51,80] and some only with certain types of cataract but not others [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the repeatability, as well as the discriminative ability of those glare tests that have been studied were often found to be inadequate [24,39]. Because of these deficiencies, a standard method of glare measurement has never been adopted, as discussed in several papers [25,34,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. Van den Berg in 1992 [50] proposed a new method to measure dysfunction caused by retinal straylight, termed the "direct compensation" method, in which a bright, ring-shaped, flickering light source was presented at an angular distance from a central visualized test field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study found that scattering remained normal until the age of 40, then doubled by 65 and tripled by 77 years. 15 …”
Section: Increasing Light-scattermentioning
confidence: 99%