2021
DOI: 10.1139/as-2020-0060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stream diatom assemblages in an Arctic catchment: diversity and relationship to ecosystem-scale primary production

Abstract: We quantified benthic diatom diversity in streams in the Miellajokka catchment, about 200 km north of the Arctic circle in Sweden. Beta diversity among sites was related to local-scale environmental heterogeneity (occurring on the order of 1 km or less), and its magnitude was equal (Sørensen Index = 0.62) to levels previously reported for rivers on regional environmental gradients across 100’s of kilometers of Arctic Fennoscandia. Species turnover was the dominant (77%) component of beta diversity in the Miell… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…deterministic calculations. We expected high junction angles (i.e., close to 90°) based on maps, satellite imagery, and our field experience in the study region (e.g., Klaus et al, 2021;Norman et al, 2022;Riley & Seekell, 2021;Seekell, Cael, Norman, et al, 2021). This is not a trivial expectation because qualitative evidence indicates that there is a substantial range of junction angles, including very low junction angles in some regions (Supporting Information S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…deterministic calculations. We expected high junction angles (i.e., close to 90°) based on maps, satellite imagery, and our field experience in the study region (e.g., Klaus et al, 2021;Norman et al, 2022;Riley & Seekell, 2021;Seekell, Cael, Norman, et al, 2021). This is not a trivial expectation because qualitative evidence indicates that there is a substantial range of junction angles, including very low junction angles in some regions (Supporting Information S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%