“…By combining both high‐frequency estimates of CO 2 flux and NEP, we quantified source contribution to the annual CO 2 air‐water flux from 14 lakes in subarctic Sweden. These systems have varying catchment conditions, such as drainage ratio (i.e., the ratio between catchment and lake area, a proxy for catchment inputs as it is related to the extent of (riverine) input from watersheds to lakes (Seekell et al., 2022)), and vegetation cover (e.g., percent forest cover), leading to distinct hydrological inputs, carbon processing times, and DOC concentrations. This variability allowed us to compare the effects of DOC concentration, drainage ratio and vegetation cover on magnitude, and sources of CO 2 evasion to evaluate the potential role of hydrology and terrestrial export in controlling annual CO 2 air‐water flux.…”