2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2008.4518662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stream weight tuning in dynamic Bayesian networks

Abstract: In this paper we present a family of algorithms for estimating stream weights for dynamic Bayesian networks with multiple observation streams. For the 2 stream case, we present a weight tuning algorithm optimal in the minimum classification error sense. We compare the algorithms to brute-force search where feasible, as well as to previously published algorithms and show that the algorithms perform as well as brute-force search and outperform previously published algorithms. We test the stream weight tuning alg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The auxiliary function in (15) can now be optimized by separately optimizing for each frame . By applying (1) to (15) we get the following expression for the auxiliary function at each : (19) independent of (20) where and are the single-modality acoustical and visual states composing the coupled state .…”
Section: A Expectation Maximization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The auxiliary function in (15) can now be optimized by separately optimizing for each frame . By applying (1) to (15) we get the following expression for the auxiliary function at each : (19) independent of (20) where and are the single-modality acoustical and visual states composing the coupled state .…”
Section: A Expectation Maximization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in some prior works, the stream weight for the whole dataset has been set to a fixed value, which was found using grid search, e.g., [11], [14] or using other tuning algorithms, e.g., [15], some authors have assumed that the stream weight is a model parameter and have estimated it using generative [16] or discriminative [17], [18] criteria. In real scenarios, however, the reliability of the audio and video modality can vary quickly, even on the frame level, and such fixed or model-dependent estimation might lead to worse results than using Bayes fusion, i.e., equal weights.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%