2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2015.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Streaming flow from ultrasound contrast agents by acoustic waves in a blood vessel model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the secondary radiation force, the particles are attracted toward the microbubbles (Hashmi et al, 2012), which may cause the measured value of the flow velocity to be lower than the true value. In order to avoid this influence, we chose particles that were smaller than those used by Cho et al (2015). The PRP of the 0.70 MPa group was significantly higher than that of the 0.35 MPa group, but the clustering time of the two groups were very close.…”
Section: Relationships Between the Ultrasound Parameters And Acousticmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under the secondary radiation force, the particles are attracted toward the microbubbles (Hashmi et al, 2012), which may cause the measured value of the flow velocity to be lower than the true value. In order to avoid this influence, we chose particles that were smaller than those used by Cho et al (2015). The PRP of the 0.70 MPa group was significantly higher than that of the 0.35 MPa group, but the clustering time of the two groups were very close.…”
Section: Relationships Between the Ultrasound Parameters And Acousticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, UMDD uses encapsulated microbubbles with a diameter of 10 µm or less. Cho et al (2015) measured the movement speed of SonoVue microbubbles caused by primary and secondary radiation forces in a blood vessel model, but they ignored the flow fields generated by the oscillation of microbubbles and microbubble clusters. Pereno et al (2018) developed an device called a layered acoustofluidic resonator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A separate study showed that microbubbles sonicated at center frequencies between 1 and 2.25 MHz caused fluid streaming velocities on the order of cm s −1 and triggered symmetric vortices at the focal volume outskirts (Cho et al 2015). It was argued that the fluid streaming patterns were produced by bubble clustering (Koda et al 2011) or coalescence (Postema et al 2004) and the collective microbubble translation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others show interest in the effects of the streaming induced by contrast agents in on-chip vessels. 163 Finally, streaming is also suspected to be an important mechanism for the delivery of drugs loaded on microbubbles. 113 Moreover, exploiting the acoustic radiation force on microbubbles that arises from the phase difference between the microbubble volumetric oscillations and the acoustic wave 164 is an important method for the manipulation of single bubbles, as well as an often undesired effect in vitro.…”
Section: Acoustic Excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%