2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.03.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Streamlining the polishing step development process via physicochemical characterization of monoclonal antibody aggregates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the potential heterogeneity of aggregate complexes studied in experiments may hamper the development of a unified aggregate clearance model. Indeed, recent studies show that aggregate surface properties are unique to each antibody (Doss et al, 2019), potentially requiring different conditions for clearance. In general, however, the majority of aggregates have more exposed hydrophobic surface areas, making nylon a potential aggregate clearance option (Telikepalli et al, 2014; Vázquez‐Rey & Lang, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the potential heterogeneity of aggregate complexes studied in experiments may hamper the development of a unified aggregate clearance model. Indeed, recent studies show that aggregate surface properties are unique to each antibody (Doss et al, 2019), potentially requiring different conditions for clearance. In general, however, the majority of aggregates have more exposed hydrophobic surface areas, making nylon a potential aggregate clearance option (Telikepalli et al, 2014; Vázquez‐Rey & Lang, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface hydrophobicity of the model proteins was also evaluated experimentally by analytical Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC) following the protocol presented by Doss et al 20 with a small modification of the mobile phase. Samples were analyzed using a TOSOH Bioscience® TSKgel Butyl‐NPR column (4.6 mm × 10 cm, Tokyo, Japan) run on an Agilent HPLC 1100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binding capacities evaluated by numerical integration of breakthrough curves out to C/C o = 0.9.F I G U R E 5Breakthrough curves for filtration of 0.2 g/L solutions of myoglobin, albumin, ribonuclease A, and α-chymotrypsin in 30 mM PBS through PDH4 depth filters at a constant filtrate flux of 0.6 LMM consideration of the detailed surface characteristics or heterogeneity of the protein (e.g., location, proximity or size of hydrophobic patches on the protein surface). In order to obtain a more direct measure of the protein hydrophobicity, we used analytical hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) to measure protein retention time on a highly hydrophobic TSKgel Butyl-NPR column with 2.5 μm nonporous particles as the stationary phase following the procedures developed by Doss et al20 No attempt was made to optimize the buffer conditions to maximize protein recovery since the goal was to evaluate the hydrophobicity based on the measured retention time.The proteins are initially denatured in a 2.3 M ammonium sulfate buffer, allowing the hydrophobic patches to strongly interact with the stationary phase. The proteins are then eluted using a 0.1 M phosphate buffer with a linear gradient in the ammonium sulfate concen-…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows an overlay of the MHIC elution profiles for suspensions of 200 nm PS NPs (PS), 200 nm silica NPs (Si), and an LAV with similar particle size. 23 The PS were examined in the presence of 0.01% Tween 20 in the binding and elution buffers; the particle yield in the absence of the surfactant was <1% due to the very hydrophobic nature of the polystyrene. The LAV and Si were studied in the absence of any surfactant.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography. AHIC was used to determine the relative hydrophobicity of the model proteins using a TSKgel Butyl-NPR column from Tosoh Bioscience with ∼1.0 mL volume and 10 cm bed height following the procedures originally described by Doss et al 23 The column was operated on a Vanquish Binary UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The column was first equilibrated with 5 column volumes (CV) of equilibration buffer containing 100 mM phosphate + 2.3 M ammonium sulfate at a pH of 7.…”
Section: ■ Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%