2018
DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2018.1448706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Street use and design: daily rhythms on four streets that differ in rated walkability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics of sidewalks, such as presence, continuity, and quality, and their influence on walkability were also studied. Findings indicate that residents report more walking when they perceive sidewalks to be accessible or of high quality (Friedman et al 1994;Brownson et al 2001;Humpel et al 2002;King et al 2003;Powell et al 2003;Boarnet et al 2005;Wang et al 2012;Werner et al 2018).…”
Section: Walkabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of sidewalks, such as presence, continuity, and quality, and their influence on walkability were also studied. Findings indicate that residents report more walking when they perceive sidewalks to be accessible or of high quality (Friedman et al 1994;Brownson et al 2001;Humpel et al 2002;King et al 2003;Powell et al 2003;Boarnet et al 2005;Wang et al 2012;Werner et al 2018).…”
Section: Walkabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The understanding of a complete (ideal) street is based on the components that the street has or might be induced; not necessarily based on a generic guideline [36]. Dividing the case area into multiple segments helps to understand the components of "time and rhythm" in public space [37]. Identifying the functionality associated with each sub-section of a relatively long stretch of the street; and classifying individual infrastructural needs based on this hierarchy is an alternative way of analysing urban mobility [38].…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public space studies have traditionally focused on outdoor public spaces, squares, plazas (Carr et al, 1992;Collins and Collins, 1986;Cooper-Marcus and Francis, 1997;Cullen, 1961;Gehl, 1987;Whyte, 1980Whyte, , 1988, streets, and sidewalks (Appleyard, 1980;Gehl, 1987;Jacobs, 1995;Kim, 2015;Loukaitou-Sideris and Ehrenfeucht, 2009;Mehta, 2007Mehta, , 2013Moudon, 1986). While earlier studies paid more attention to the physical conditions of public space, recent studies have diversified their focus to include social and temporal dimensions, including street characteristics and social activity (Mehta, 2007;Mehta and Bosson, 2018), identifying spatial patterns of outdoor social activities (Shirazi, 2018), and exploring temporal dimensions of public space (Shirazi, 2018;Werner et al, 2018). The notion of the public realm has expanded to include emerging urban spaces, shopping malls, corridors (Al, 2016), elevated paths (Frampton et al, 2012;Yoos and James, 2016), and parking lots (Ben-Joseph, 2012).…”
Section: Numbers In Urban Design Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%