2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength and ductility performance of concrete-filled steel tubular columns after long-term service loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was an error between the results with or without the bond-slip and the experimental values due to the difference between the RPC constitutive relationship curve and the actual value. The dilatancy angle, eccentricity, the ratio of initial equibiaxial compressive yield stress to initial uniaxial compressive yield stress, the ratio of the second stress invariant on the tensile meridian, and viscosity coefficient were set as 30°, 0.1, 1.16, 0.6667 and 0.0005, respectively [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. Thus, the bond-slip constitutive relationship between the section steel and RPC was not accurate.…”
Section: Experimental Simulation Of Steel-reinforced Reactive Powder Concrete Beams Under Bendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was an error between the results with or without the bond-slip and the experimental values due to the difference between the RPC constitutive relationship curve and the actual value. The dilatancy angle, eccentricity, the ratio of initial equibiaxial compressive yield stress to initial uniaxial compressive yield stress, the ratio of the second stress invariant on the tensile meridian, and viscosity coefficient were set as 30°, 0.1, 1.16, 0.6667 and 0.0005, respectively [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. Thus, the bond-slip constitutive relationship between the section steel and RPC was not accurate.…”
Section: Experimental Simulation Of Steel-reinforced Reactive Powder Concrete Beams Under Bendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e experimental results were compared using the FE model developed using ABAQUS. After several trials, the angle of Advances in Civil Engineering friction was taken as 50°, flow stress ratio as 1, and dilation angle was taken as 30° [8] to simulate the actual behavior. e coefficient of friction between steel and concrete is taken as 0.6 [3].…”
Section: Analytical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8-noded brick elements (C3D8) with 24 DOFs are used for the modeling of concrete core, and 4-noded shell element (S4R) [9] with 6 DOF is used for modeling of steel. Poisson's ratio for concrete is taken as 0.2 and that of steel is taken as 0.3 [8]. Displacement degrees of freedom in all three directions (U1, U2, and U3) and rotational degrees of freedom in all three directions are restrained to be zero at bottom.…”
Section: Analytical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ichinose et al [10] also reported a series of similar tests to obtain creep coefficients. Naguib and Mirmiran [11] and Liu et al [12] developed an algorithm for the time-dependent behavior of CFST using the rate of flow method and the double power law functions for the creep of concrete. Shrestha and Chen [13] worked on the aging and creep coefficients of confined concrete, but the effect of steel tube was excluded in their formulas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%