2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0216-9_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength and Failure Energy for Adhesive Interfaces as a Function of Loading Rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weerasooriya et al [14] used a similar method to study the dynamic failure behavior of adhesive bond interfaces. Both Weerasooriya et al and Syn et al showed an increase in failure load and energy rate for fracture initiation as loading rate increased from low to high rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Weerasooriya et al [14] used a similar method to study the dynamic failure behavior of adhesive bond interfaces. Both Weerasooriya et al and Syn et al showed an increase in failure load and energy rate for fracture initiation as loading rate increased from low to high rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the present work, a unique fracture specimen was developed similar to the specimens used in [13,14]. The specimen loading surfaces were designed to be curved instead of flat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combined research (1-3) allowed determination of fracture energies by examining the load-displacement curve from either the servo-hydraulic tester or through traditional split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) bar analysis. However, measurement of fracture toughness through crack-tip opening displacements or local strain fields was well outside of the digital image correlation (DIC) system's resolution (2,3), as the epoxies and adhesives considered were quite brittle and displacements near the crack-tip are on the order of 10 m. Stress intensity factor solutions for butterfly specimens are not available in the literature, preventing comparison of the measured fracture energies with the expected stress intensity factors at the crack-tip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%