1984
DOI: 10.1016/0143-7496(84)90103-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength prediction of bonded single lap joints by non-linear finite element methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
97
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
97
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…On the strength prediction of bonded assemblies, two different lines of analyses were developed over the years: the strength of materials and fracture mechanics-based methods. The strength of materials approach is based on the evaluation of allowable stresses [10,11] or strains [12,13], by theoretical formulations or the FEM. The assemblies strength can be predicted by comparing the respective equivalent stresses or strains at the critical regions, obtained by stress or strain-based criteria, with the properties of the structure constituents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the strength prediction of bonded assemblies, two different lines of analyses were developed over the years: the strength of materials and fracture mechanics-based methods. The strength of materials approach is based on the evaluation of allowable stresses [10,11] or strains [12,13], by theoretical formulations or the FEM. The assemblies strength can be predicted by comparing the respective equivalent stresses or strains at the critical regions, obtained by stress or strain-based criteria, with the properties of the structure constituents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess failure within the adhesive, a failure criterion is needed. The suitability of different failure criteria for adhesives in single lap joints was studied by Harris and Adams [33], with the conclusion that for toughened ductile adhesive like the one used in the present study, the maximum principal strain is the best suited criterion. Further work carried out by Broughton et al [22] also showed that strain-based failure criteria give more accurate results than stress-based failure criteria for adhesively bonded joints.…”
Section: Failure Criterionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Modern polymeric adhesives are usually highly nonlinear, causing linear elastic analysis to be insufficient. Furthermore, the eccentricity of many joint configurations results in large rotations early on in the loading 5,10,11 , necessitating the consideration of nonlinear geometric effects Therefore, geometric nonlinear effects due to large rotations and material nonlinearity are pivotal in predicting the strength of a joint. This paper will extend the previously created joint element to include these effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have done this by utilizing a Von Mises strain criterion or similar methods 5,11,21 . For the current formulation, it was assumed that the bulk adhesive tensile specimen strain and the adhesive layer strains were linearly related to each other through the equations …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%