“…Finally, the slight difference interpreted by Angeli et al (1996Angeli et al ( , 2004 between the shearing resistance that was overcome to reactivate slope movement, and shearing resistance that was mobilized to stop movement, may be attributed to displacement self-stabilization where geometry allows (Salt 1988;Skempton et al 1989). Gibo et al (2002) examined strength recovery from residual condition in reactivated landslides using a new ring shear apparatus with shear surface within soil at the gap between the upper and lower confining rings. Remolded samples from the Kamenose landslide (w ℓ ¼ 114%, I p ¼ 64%, CF ¼ 73%; 77% smectite-Ca and Mg montmorillonite, 14% quartz), and Xuechengzhen landslide (w ℓ ¼ 32%, I p ¼ 14%, CF ¼ 10%; 25% chlorite, 30% mica, 33% quartz, 11% feldspars) were used in the ring shear tests.…”