Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3209281.3209312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening community data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional environmental risk assessment models require a causal link between the risk and the outcome with statistical significance before taking action, which can be very difficult to achieve due to complex relationships between local people and their environments. 29 As a result, citizens collect their own community data (as defined by Carroll et al., 30 such as photographs of smoke emission from a nearby factory) as an alternative to prove their hypotheses. From scientists’ point of view, however, such strong assumption-driven evidentiary collection can lead to biases since the collection, annotation, and analysis of community data are conducted in a manner that strongly favors the assumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional environmental risk assessment models require a causal link between the risk and the outcome with statistical significance before taking action, which can be very difficult to achieve due to complex relationships between local people and their environments. 29 As a result, citizens collect their own community data (as defined by Carroll et al., 30 such as photographs of smoke emission from a nearby factory) as an alternative to prove their hypotheses. From scientists’ point of view, however, such strong assumption-driven evidentiary collection can lead to biases since the collection, annotation, and analysis of community data are conducted in a manner that strongly favors the assumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%