2015
DOI: 10.9734/ejnfs/2015/21112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening Implementation and Utilization of Nutrition Interventions through Research: A Framework and Research Agenda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both benefits and costs are likely to change as programs scale up (Alderman, Behrman, and Puett 2017;Menon and others 2014); benefits for hard-to-reach subpopulations may be higher or lower than for the general population, but costs are more likely to increase as programs expand coverage. This is a generic concern, but it is more likely to affect more personnel-intensive programs, such as counseling, relative to micronutrient fortification or supplementation.…”
Section: Benefit-cost Estimates For Nutritional Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both benefits and costs are likely to change as programs scale up (Alderman, Behrman, and Puett 2017;Menon and others 2014); benefits for hard-to-reach subpopulations may be higher or lower than for the general population, but costs are more likely to increase as programs expand coverage. This is a generic concern, but it is more likely to affect more personnel-intensive programs, such as counseling, relative to micronutrient fortification or supplementation.…”
Section: Benefit-cost Estimates For Nutritional Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation, analysis framework and interpretability of results of any evaluation at a national scale are often complex. For example, when an intervention is implemented in a complex setting, a number of factors might influence it independently or interdependently (1,3,4) , which affects the impact evaluation design approach and potential interpretability of results (5) . Considering this, implementation researchers suggest evaluating the implementation process prospectively instead of retrospectively, alongside the outcome evaluation, to get a comprehensive understanding about what occurs during implementation (1,6) , as well as to create opportunities for course correction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the goal of improving implementation and scale-up of evidence-based nutrition interventions, Menon et al (2014) propose an implementation-focused nutrition framework (Figure 3.10). The framework was designed to help identify which issues need most attention in a particular context.…”
Section: Implementation and Vertical Coherencementioning
confidence: 99%